Thing Concept

A Thing Concept is an elementary concept that represents any form of existence within ontological frameworks and serves as a foundational abstraction for knowledge representation systems.

• AKA: Entity Concept, Object Concept, Basic Concept, Existence Concept, Fundamental Ontological Unit, Res, Substance Concept.
• Context:
  • It can typically represent physical entities through thing material existence descriptions.
  • It can typically represent abstract entities through thing non-physical existence descriptions.
  • It can typically represent relations through thing connection specifications between other things.
  • It can typically represent systems through thing organized structure descriptions.
  • It can typically represent phenomena through thing observable manifestation descriptions.
  • It can typically serve as Foundational Element in thing knowledge representations.
  • It can typically support Thing Classification through thing taxonomic structures.
  • It can typically enable Conceptual Modeling through thing formal descriptions.
  • It can typically structure Formal Language through thing semantic references to world elements.
  • It can typically reflect Cognitive Structure through thing innate categorization mechanisms.
  • ...
  • It can often be Similar to another thing based on thing attribute comparisons.
  • It can often be Near to another thing in thing conceptual space or physical space.
  • It can often function as Organizational Unit within thing upper-level ontology frameworks.
  • It can often provide Thing Hierarchy through thing inheritance relations.
  • It can often facilitate Thing Identification through thing unique identifiers.
  • It can often support Ontological Reasoning through thing logical inference rules.
  • It can often enable Knowledge Integration across thing domain boundarys.
  • It can often structure Information Architecture through thing categorical organization.
  • It can often guide Task Definition through thing operational objectives and thing transformation goals.
  • It can often connect Linguistic Expressions to thing referential meanings.
  • It can often bridge Materialist Perspectives and Idealist Perspectives within thing philosophical frameworks.
  • It can often enable Relation Reification by treating relationships as first-class entities.
  • It can often support Universal Classification as a top-level class in thing computational ontologys.
  • ...
  • It can range from being a Concrete Thing Concept to being an Abstract Thing Concept, depending on its thing tangibility aspect.
  • It can range from being a Simple Thing Concept to being a Complex Thing Concept, depending on its thing compositional structure.
  • It can range from being a Domain-Specific Thing Concept to being a Universal Thing Concept, depending on its thing scope of application.
  • It can range from being a Static Thing Concept to being a Dynamic Thing Concept, depending on its thing temporal stability.
  • It can range from being a Primitive Thing Concept to being a Derived Thing Concept, depending on its thing definitional dependency.
  • It can range from being a Singular Thing Concept to being a Collective Thing Concept, depending on its thing aggregation level.
  • It can range from being a Descriptive Thing Concept to being a Normative Thing Concept, depending on its thing prescriptive nature.
  • It can range from being an Independent Thing Concept to being a Relational Thing Concept, depending on its thing autonomy characteristic.
  • It can range from being a Material Thing Concept to being an Ideal Thing Concept, depending on its thing philosophical foundation.
  • It can range from being a Named Thing Concept to being an Anonymous Thing Concept, depending on its thing identification status.
  • It can range from being a Continuant Thing Concept to being an Occurrent Thing Concept, depending on its thing temporal existence pattern.
  • ...
  • It can integrate with Thing Attribute System for thing property management.
  • It can connect to Thing Relation System for thing relationship modeling.
  • It can support Thing Inference Engine for thing knowledge reasoning.
  • It can participate in Thing Operation Framework for thing transformation process modeling.
  • It can function within Thing Classification System for thing taxonomic organization.
  • It can serve in Thing Validation System for thing consistency checking.
  • It can operate within Thing Query System for thing information retrieval.
  • It can establish Thing Referential Connections between linguistic terms and world objects.
  • It can enable Thing Comparison through thing similarity metrics and thing distance measures.
  • It can provide Thing Ontological Grounding for thing task definitions and thing process specifications.
  • It can coordinate Thing Philosophical Perspectives on thing existence representation.
  • It can support Thing Historical Philosophical Traditions from Aristotelian substance theory to Kantian epistemology.
  • It can reflect Thing Early Cognitive Development through thing object permanence and thing entity recognition.
  • It can implement Thing Technical Ontology Standards as the root class in systems like OWL and Schema.org.
  • It can transform Relations into Things through thing reification processes.
  • ...
• Examples:
  • Thing Concept Temporal Evolution, such as:
    • Historical Thing Concept (pre-20th century), demonstrating thing philosophical foundations and thing historical philosophical traditions.
      • Aristotelian Thing Concept (4th century BCE), establishing thing taxonomic structures through substance-accident distinction.
      • Medieval Thing Concept (5th-15th century), connecting thing referential meanings through realist ontology.
      • Cartesian Thing Concept (17th century), representing both physical entities and abstract entities through dualism.
      • Kantian Thing Concept (18th century), structuring thing formal descriptions of phenomenon and noumenon.
    • Modern Thing Concept (20th century), demonstrating thing conceptual modeling through formal representation.
      • Logical Positivist Thing Concept (1920s-1950s), using thing semantic references to world elements.
      • Set-Theoretic Thing Concept (1950s-1970s), supporting thing universal classification in formal systems.
      • Cognitive Science Thing Concept (1970s-1990s), reflecting thing innate categorization mechanisms.
      • Computational Thing Concept (1990s-2010s), facilitating thing knowledge integration across thing domain boundarys.
    • Contemporary Thing Concept (21st century), enabling thing ontological reasoning through thing logical inference rules.
      • Semantic Web Thing Concept (2000s-present), implementing thing technical ontology standards.
      • Machine Learning Thing Concept (2010s-present), supporting thing comparison through thing similarity metrics.
      • Knowledge Graph Thing Concept (2010s-present), structuring thing information architecture through thing categorical organization.
  • Thing Concept Historical Foundations, such as:
    • Philosophical Thing Concepts, such as:
      • Aristotelian Substance for thing independent existence representation, demonstrating how thing concepts represent physical entities.
      • Cartesian Res Extensa for thing material substance representation, exemplifying the material thing concept range endpoint.
      • Cartesian Res Cogitans for thing mental substance representation, exemplifying the ideal thing concept range endpoint.
      • Kantian Phenomenon for thing appearance representation, illustrating how thing concepts reflect cognitive structure.
      • Kantian Noumenon for thing-in-itself representation, showing how thing concepts bridge materialist perspectives and idealist perspectives.
    • Cognitive Thing Concepts, such as:
      • Object Permanence for thing persistent existence recognition, demonstrating thing early cognitive development.
      • Spelke Object Principle for thing infant object recognition, reflecting thing innate categorization mechanisms.
      • Perceptual Object for thing sensory input organization, showing how concrete thing concepts are formed.
      • Core Knowledge Object for thing innate conceptual category, supporting thing classification through thing taxonomic structures.
      • Bounded Entity for thing cohesive unit recognition, facilitating thing identification through thing unique identifiers.
  • Thing Concept Implementations, such as:
    • Knowledge Representation Things, such as:
      • OWL:Thing for thing universal class representation, exemplifying how thing concepts support universal classification as a top-level class.
      • Schema.org Thing for thing web data organization, demonstrating how thing concepts structure information architecture.
      • Upper Ontology Entity for thing top-level category representation, showing how thing concepts function as organizational units within thing upper-level ontology frameworks.
      • Domain Ontology Root for thing field-specific hierarchy foundation, illustrating how domain-specific thing concepts operate.
      • Protégé Thing Class for thing ontology modeling foundation, exemplifying how thing concepts enable conceptual modeling.
  • Thing Concept Categories, such as:
    • Physical Thing Concepts, such as:
      • Material Entity for thing tangible object representation, demonstrating how thing concepts represent physical entities.
      • Elementary Unit for thing fundamental physical component representation, exemplifying simple thing concepts.
      • Physical System for thing material organization representation, showing how thing concepts represent systems.
      • Physical Process for thing material transformation representation, illustrating the dynamic thing concept range endpoint.
      • Visual Artifact for thing perceptible object representation, demonstrating concrete thing concepts.
    • Abstract Thing Concepts, such as:
      • Abstract Entity for thing non-physical existence representation, exemplifying how thing concepts represent abstract entities.
      • Concept for thing mental abstraction representation, demonstrating the abstract thing concept range endpoint.
      • Mathematical Object for thing formal structure representation, showing how thing concepts structure formal language.
      • Information Entity for thing symbolic content representation, illustrating how thing concepts connect linguistic expressions to thing referential meanings.
      • High-level Concept for thing general abstraction representation, exemplifying the universal thing concept range endpoint.
    • Temporal Thing Concepts, such as:
      • Continuant for thing identity-preserving entity representation, demonstrating the continuant thing concept range endpoint.
      • Occurrent for thing temporal process representation, illustrating the occurrent thing concept range endpoint.
      • Endurant for thing persistent object representation, exemplifying the static thing concept range endpoint.
      • Perdurant for thing unfolding event representation, showing the dynamic thing concept range endpoint.
      • Temporal Part for thing time-slice representation, demonstrating how thing concepts handle thing temporal existence patterns.
    • Operational Thing Concepts, such as:
      • Formal Operation for thing state transformation representation, showing how thing concepts guide task definition.
      • Processing Task for thing information transformation representation, demonstrating how thing concepts participate in thing operation framework.
      • Production Task for thing creation process representation, exemplifying how thing concepts support thing process specifications.
      • Profiling Task for thing characteristic analysis representation, illustrating how thing concepts enable thing comparison.
      • Canonicalization Task for thing standardization process representation, showing how thing concepts serve in thing validation system.
    • Relational Thing Concepts, such as:
      • Causal Relation for thing cause-effect connection representation, demonstrating how thing concepts represent relations.
      • Semantic Relation for thing meaning-based connection representation, illustrating the relational thing concept range endpoint.
      • MemberOf Relation for thing set membership representation, exemplifying how thing concepts connect to thing relation system.
      • Non-Member Relation for thing set exclusion representation, showing how thing concepts establish relationships.
      • Verb Semantic Argument for thing action-participant relationship representation, demonstrating how thing concepts structure formal language.
    • Reified Thing Concepts, such as:
      • Reified Relationship for thing relation-as-entity representation, demonstrating how thing concepts enable relation reification.
      • Event Object for thing process-as-entity representation, exemplifying how thing concepts transform relations into things.
      • State Object for thing condition-as-entity representation, showing thing concept flexibility in representation.
      • Property Object for thing attribute-as-entity representation, illustrating integration with thing attribute system.
      • Situation Object for thing context-as-entity representation, demonstrating the complex thing concept range endpoint.
  • ...
• Counter-Examples:
  • Specific Instance, which is a particular occurrence of a thing concept rather than the abstraction itself, failing the requirement that a thing concept serves as a foundational abstraction for knowledge representation systems.
  • Pure Process, which is a continuous activity without stable identity required for thing conceptualization, contradicting the capability of thing concepts to support thing classification through thing taxonomic structures.
  • Nothing Concept, which represents the absence of existence rather than a form of existence, directly opposing the core definition of thing concepts as representing forms of existence within ontological frameworks.
  • Indescribable Phenomenon, which cannot be formally characterized within ontological frameworks, violating the capability of thing concepts to enable conceptual modeling through thing formal descriptions.
  • Contradictory Object, which violates logical consistency requirements for thing conceptualization, failing to support ontological reasoning through thing logical inference rules.
  • Shifting Referent, which lacks the conceptual stability necessary for thing identification, undermining the capability to facilitate thing identification through thing unique identifiers.
  • Emergent Property, which exists only as a collective manifestation rather than as an independent thing, conflicting with the capability to represent entities as discrete things with defined boundaries.
  • Unlimited Totality, which represents unbounded collections without definable boundarys, preventing integration with thing classification system for thing taxonomic organization.
  • Purely Subjective Experience, which lacks intersubjective verification required for formal representation, failing to establish thing referential connections between linguistic terms and world objects.
  • Undefined Abstraction, which has not been formally specified within an ontological framework, unable to implement thing technical ontology standards as required.
• See: Nothing, Everything, SUMO Ontology, Observation, Referent, Role, Thing Set, Entity, Abstract Entity, Formal Operation, Relation, Object, Concept, Ontological Category, Knowledge Representation, Conceptual Framework, Formal Ontology, Upper Ontology, Semantic Model, Categorical Logic, Type Theory, Mereology, Reality Model, Linguistic Reference, Materialist Theory, Idealist Philosophy, Aristotelian Metaphysics, Cartesian Dualism, Kantian Epistemology, Cognitive Development, Object Permanence, OWL Ontology, Schema.org, Reification, Basic Formal Ontology, DOLCE Ontology, Continuant-Occurrent Distinction, Identification System, Distance Function, Task Framework, Process Specification.

---

---

References

2025-05-13

• Deep Research https://chatgpt.com/s/dr_682301f2bd788191b8323325c5a19607
  • Question: What is a Thing Concept and how does it function as an elementary construct in ontological, epistemological, and formal representation frameworks?
  • Answer: A Thing Concept is an elementary construct that represents the most general concept of an entity - anything that can be said to exist or be conceived of. It serves as an ontological foundation, standing at the basis of what there is, and as an epistemological construct, framing how we cognize and reference any object of knowledge.
    • Key Aspects of Thing Concept:
      • Entity Representation: Thing Concepts can represent physical entities through material existence descriptions, abstract entities through non-physical existence descriptions, relations through connection specifications between other things, systems through organized structure descriptions, and phenomena through observable manifestation descriptions.
      • Knowledge Organization Functions: Thing Concepts typically serve as foundational elements in thing knowledge representations, support classification through taxonomic structures, enable conceptual modeling through formal descriptions, and structure formal languages through semantic references to world elements.
    • Philosophical Perspectives:
      • Classical Ontology View: In classical ontology, individual things are treated as the basic building blocks of reality. Aristotle's metaphysics uses the concept of substance to describe fundamental things that exist independently and bear properties.
      • Medieval Perspective: Medieval scholastic thinkers classed res (Latin for "thing") among the transcendental concepts that apply to absolutely everything, essentially coextensive with the very notion of being.
      • Cartesian Dualism: Descartes used res to designate two fundamental kinds of entities: res extensa (extended thing or physical substance) and res cogitans (thinking thing or mental substance).
      • Kantian Perspective: Kant distinguished between the thing-in-itself (Ding an sich), which is reality independent of observation, versus the phenomenon, which is the thing as it appears to us.
      • Process Philosophy Perspective: Some ontologies prioritize processes or relations over substances, arguing that events or systems are more fundamental than static things.
    • Epistemological Aspects:
      • Cognitive Foundation: The Thing Concept underlies how we categorize and know the world at the most basic level. Developmental psychology shows that infants perceive the world in terms of discrete, enduring objects.
      • Object Principles: Spelke's object principles capture the essence of object-hood, including object permanence, solidity, and continuity.
      • Basic Epistemic Operations: Treating something as a "thing" enables individuation, categorization, and reasoning about it as a unit.
      • Agnostic Reference: The broad epistemic label "thing" enables a kind of agnostic reference - we can talk about an entity without committing to what kind of entity it is.
    • Knowledge Representation Role:
      • Classification Hierarchy Root: In information science and knowledge engineering, the Thing Concept is implemented as a top-level class or universal type. In OWL, the class owl:Thing is the universal superclass containing every individual.
      • Schema Organization: The Schema.org vocabulary uses Thing as its root type: "the most generic type of item" under which all more specific types are subclassed.
      • Ontology Engineering: The Thing Concept simplifies the ontology engineering process by providing a starting point to specialize into a taxonomy of increasingly specific classes.
      • Reification Support: The versatility of the Thing Concept enables reification - turning a relation or predicate into an entity that can have properties or participate in other relations.
    • Formal Ontology Usage:
      • Upper Ontology Role: Different upper ontologies articulate what immediately underlies Thing, reflecting various dimensions of ontological distinction.
      • Basic Formal Ontology: The BFO places Entity at the apex (equivalent to Thing), then splits it into Continuants vs. Occurrents based on temporal behavior.
      • Conceptual Modeling: In conceptual modeling for information systems, while models don't always explicitly show a class named "Thing", they implicitly assume every entity type is a subtype of a universal object class.
      • Formal Semantics: Formal semantics often define special "top" and "bottom" elements corresponding to Thing and "Nothing" respectively.
    • Dimensional Variations:
      • Simplicity vs. Complexity: Thing Concepts can range from being Simple Thing Concepts to being Complex Thing Concepts, depending on their compositional structure.
      • Abstraction Level: Thing Concepts can range from being Concrete Thing Concepts to being Abstract Thing Concepts, depending on their tangibility aspect.
      • Domain Specificity: Thing Concepts can range from being Domain-Specific Thing Concepts to being Universal Thing Concepts, depending on their scope of application.
      • Temporal Dynamics: Thing Concepts can range from being Static Thing Concepts to being Dynamic Thing Concepts, depending on their temporal stability.
      • Philosophical Orientation: Thing Concepts can range from being Material Thing Concepts to being Ideal Thing Concepts, depending on their philosophical foundation.
  • Citations:

[1] Schema.org vocabulary - https://schema.org/Thing
[2] Web Ontology Language (OWL) - https://people.cs.vt.edu
[3] Bunge-Wand-Weber (BWW) ontology - https://philarchive.org
[4] Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) - https://artint.info
[5] Developmental psychology studies - https://campuspress.yale.edu

---