1996 TheBigFiveversustheBigFourTheRe

From GM-RKB
(Redirected from Furnham, 1996)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • (Furnham, 1996) ⇒ Adrian Furnham. (1996). “The Big Five versus the Big Four: The Relationship Between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI Five Factor Model of Personality.” In: Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2).

Subject Headings: NEO-PI, MBTI.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Abstract

This study sets out to examine the relationship between two personality measures - most popularly used measure in the consultancy and training world (the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) and one of the most heavily used measures in the academic research area on personality (the five factor NEO-PI). One hundred and sixty adults completed the NEO-PI and the MBTI. The NEO-PI Agreeableness score was correlated only with the thinking-feeling (T-F) dimension; the NEO-PI Conscientiousness score was correlated with both thinking-feeling and judging-perceiving (J-P) dimension; the NEO-PI Extraversion score was strongly correlated with the extraversion-introversion (E-I) dimensions, while the Neuroticism score from the NEO-PI was not related to any MBTI subscale score. The openness dimension was correlated with all four especially sensing-intuitive. These results were related to two other similar comparative studies. Results are discussed in terms of recent criticisms of the MBTI.

References

;

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
1996 TheBigFiveversustheBigFourTheReAdrian FurnhamThe Big Five versus the Big Four: The Relationship Between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) and NEO-PI Five Factor Model of Personality1996
Retrieved from "http://www.gabormelli.com/RKB/index.php?title=1996_TheBigFiveversustheBigFourTheRe&oldid=833616"