1996 MotivationsandMethodsforTextSim

• (Chandrasekar et al., 1996) ⇒ Raman Chandrasekar, Christine Doran, and B. Srinivas. (1996). “Motivations and Methods for Text Simplification.” In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2. In: Proceedings of the 16th conference on Computational linguistics - Volume 2. doi:10.3115/993268.993361

Subject Headings: Text Simplification Task;

Cited By

• http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%221996%22+%5Bhttp%3A%2F%2Facl.ldc.upenn.edu%2FC%2FC96%2FC96-2183.pdf+Motivations+and+Methods+for+Text+Simplification%5D
• http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=993268.993361&preflayout=flat#citedby

Quotes

Abstract

Long and complicated sentences prove to be a stumbling block for current systems relying on NL input. These systems stand to gain from methods that syntactically simplify such sentences. To simplify a sentence, we need an idea of the structure of the sentence, to identify the components to be separated out. Obviously a parser could be used to obtain the complete structure of the sentence. However, full parsing is slow and prone to failure, especially on complex sentences. In this paper, we consider two alternatives to full parsing which could be used for simplification. The first approach uses a Finite State Grammar (FSG) to produce noun and verb groups while the second uses a Supertagging model to produce dependency linkages. We discuss the impact of these two input representations on the [[simplification process.

References

;

	Author	volume	Date Value	title	type	journal	titleUrl	doi	note	year
1996 MotivationsandMethodsforTextSim	Christine Doran B. Srinivas Raman Chandrasekar			Motivations and Methods for Text Simplification				10.3115/993268.993361		1996