1995 CorpusStatisticsMeetTheNounCompound

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Subject Headings: Language Modeling, Noun Compound Bracketing Task, Compound Noun, Noun-Noun Compound.

Notes

  • Note: Uses examples
    • "[woman/N [aid/N worker/N]]"
    • "[hydrogen/N ion/N] exchange/N]"
  • Note: This work is based on the thesis published in the same year

Cited By

2007

Quotes

Abstract

A variety of statistical methods for noun compound analysis are implemented and compared. The results support two main conclusions. First, the use of conceptual association not only enables a broad coverage, but also improves the accuracy. Second, an analysis model based on dependency grammar is substantially more accurate than one based on deepest constituents, even though the latter is more prevalent in the literature.


References

  • Yigal Arens, John J. Granacki, Alice C. Parker, Phrasal analysis of long noun sequences, Proceedings of the 25th annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p.59-64, July 06-09, 1987, Stanford, California doi:10.3115/981175.981184
  • Michael R. Brent, From grammar to lexicon: unsupervised learning of lexical syntax, Computational Linguistics, v.19 n.2, June 1993
  • Eric D. Brill, A corpus-based approach to language learning, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1993
  • Eugene Charniak, Statistical Language Learning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994
  • Timothy Wilking Finin, The semantic interpretation of compound nominals, 1980
  • Donald Hindle, Mats Rooth, Structural ambiguity and lexical relations, Computational Linguistics, v.19 n.1, March 1993
  • Pierre Isabelle, Another look at nominal compounds, Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, p.509-516, July 02-06, 1984, Stanford, California
  • Daniel Karp, Yves Schabes, Martin Zaidel, Dania Egedi, A freely available wide coverage morphological analyzer for English, Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics, August 23-28, 1992, Nantes, France doi:10.3115/992383.992409
  • Kobayasi Yosiyuki, Tokunaga Takenobu, Tanaka Hozumi, Analysis of Japanese compound nouns using collocational information, Proceedings of the 15th conference on Computational linguistics, August 05-09, 1994, Kyoto, Japan doi:10.3115/991250.991287
  • Mark Lauer, Conceptual association for compound noun analysis, Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, June 27-30, 1994, Las Cruces, New Mexico doi:10.3115/981732.981785
  • Lauer, M. and Dras, M. (1994). A Probabilistic Model of Compound Nouns. In: Proceedings of the 7th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Armidale, NSW, Australia. World Scientific Press, pp. 474--81.
  • Leonard, Rosemary. 1984. The Interpretation of English Noun Sequences on the Computer. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  • Levi, Judith. 1978. The Syntax and Semantics of Complex Nominals. Academic Press, New York.
  • Liberman, M. and Sproat, R. (1992). The Stress and Structure of Modified Noun Phrases in English. In Sag, I. and Szabolcsi, A., editors, Lexical Matters CSLI Lecture NotesNo. 24. University of Chicago Press, pp. 131--81.
  • Mitchell P. Marcus, Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Languages, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1980
  • David Blair Mcdonald, Understanding noun compounds, 1982
  • James Pustejovsky, Peter Anick, Sabine Bergler, Lexical semantic techniques for corpus analysis, Computational Linguistics, v.19 n.2, June 1993
  • Philip Resnik, Selection and information: a class-based approach to lexical relationships, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 1993
  • Philip Resnik and Hearst, M. (1993). Structural Ambiguity and Conceptual Relations. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Very Large Corpora: Academic and Industrial Perspectives, June 22, Ohio State University, pp. 58--64.
  • Ryder, Mary Ellen. (1994). Ordered Chaos: The Interpretation of English Noun-Noun Compounds. University of California Press Publications in Linguistics, Vol 123.
  • Frank Smadja, Retrieving collocations from text: Xtract, Computational Linguistics, v.19 n.1, March 1993
  • Karen Spärck Jones, Compound noun interpretation problems, Computer speech processing, Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK, 1986
  • Richard Sproat. (1994). English noun-phrase accent prediction for text-to-speech. In Computer Speech and Language, Vol 8, pp. 79--94.
  • Vanderwende, Lucy. (1993). SENS: The System for Evaluating Noun Sequences. In Jensen, K., Heidorn, G. and Richardson, S., editors, Natural Language Processing: The PLNLP Approach. Kluwer Academic, pp. 161--73.
  • ter Stal, Wilco. (1995). Syntactic Disambiguation of Nominal Compounds Using Lexical and Conceptual Association. Memorandum UT-KBS-95-002, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.
  • David Yarowsky, Word-sense disambiguation using statistical models of Roget's categories trained on large corpora, Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics, August 23-28, 1992, Nantes, France doi:10.3115/992133.992140,


 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
1995 CorpusStatisticsMeetTheNounCompoundMark LauerCorpus Statistics Meet the Noun Compound: Some empirical resultsProceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguisticshttp://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/P/P95/P95-1007.pdf10.3115/981658.9816651995
Retrieved from "http://www.gabormelli.com/RKB/index.php?title=1995_CorpusStatisticsMeetTheNounCompound&oldid=844598"