State-Sanctioned Surveillance

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

A State-Sanctioned Surveillance is a state surveillance that, while not directly conducted by government bodies, is officially approved or authorized by the state.

  • Context:
    • It can be related to but distinct from State Surveillance and State-Sponsored Surveillance, focusing on the endorsement rather than the direct execution of surveillance.
    • It cam allows states to leverage the capabilities of third parties, thus extending their surveillance reach without direct involvement.
    • It is often justified on similar grounds as other forms of surveillance, such as National Security, Public Safety, and Law Enforcement, but it can also be aimed at economic or strategic advantages.
    • It can blur the lines between private and public sectors, raising unique concerns regarding accountability and transparency.
    • It can facilitate a broader range of surveillance activities, sometimes escaping the stricter oversight that governs direct state operations.
    • ...
  • Example(s):
    • Agreements where telecommunications companies provide user data to the government under legal and financial incentives.
    • Projects where technology firms develop surveillance technologies and systems specifically for state use, even if the state does not directly manage the systems.
    • Collaboration between states and international tech companies to monitor communications across borders.
    • ...
  • Counter-Example(s):
    • Direct government surveillance operations, where no third-party entities are involved.
    • Surveillance activities conducted without official state endorsement or legal framework.
    • State-Sanctioned Violence.
    • ...
  • See: State Surveillance, State-Sponsored Surveillance, Privacy Rights, Civil Liberties, Corporate Surveillance, Surveillance Capitalism, National Security.