Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ)
A Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ) is a PRO assessment that is designed to capture the impact of migraine on physical, social, and emotional functioning within a 7-day time period.
- Context:
- It can (typically) contain up 26 items that use a 5-point response scale.
- …
- Example(s):
- MFIQ Version 0.1,
- MFIQ Version 1.0 (a 19-item questionnaire),
- MFIQ Version 2.0 (a 26-item questionnaire),
- …
- Counter-Example(s):
- a 24-Hour Migraine Quality of Life Questionnaire (24-Hr MQoLQ),
- a HEADWORK Questionnaire,
- a Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary (MPFID),
- a Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) Questionnaire,
- a Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ),
- a Six-Item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6),
- a WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II).
- See: Episodic Migraine (EM), Chronic Migraine (CM), SAFER Eligibility Check, Patient Intervention Questionnaire, Patient Intervention Outcome, Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) System, Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO), Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI) Measure, International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD), Neurological Disorder.
References
2021
- (D'Amico et al., 2021) ⇒ Domenico D'Amico, Stewart J. Tepper, Erika Guastafierro, Claudia Toppo, Matilde Leonardi, Licia Grazzi, Paolo Martelletti, and Alberto Raggi (2021)."Mapping Assessments Instruments for Headache Disorders against the ICF Biopsychosocial Model of Health and Disability". In: International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(1). DOI:10.3390/ijerph18010246.
- QUOTE: Published results are mostly connected to migraine, and more specifically to chronic migraine (CM), and obtained through the use of few assessment instruments, namely the Migraine Disability Assessment scale (MIDAS)[1], the six-Item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)[2], and the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) [3]. There is a lack of information about TTH and poor information about cluster headache (CH) [4], a condition in which most of research was designed using again the HIT-6, MIDAS, and the MSQ(...)
Almost all assessment instruments retrieved in this review have been used in migraine research, with the exclusion of two CH-specific assessments.
The most used tools were MIDAS[1], HIT-6[2], and the MSQ[3], used in 80, 56, and 27 studies, respectively. In addition to this, 11 studies employed an instrument from the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) family [5],[6] (either the 36 or 12 item version), and 10 studies employed an instrument from the Short-Form (SF) Health Survey family, i.e., the SF-36, SF-12, or SF-8 [7]. The ICF-linked items by domain for each of the assessment tools used in the research papers included in our analysis are reported in Table 2(...)
Other less used tools were the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ)[8], the Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary (MFIPD)[9] addressing impact on daily functioning, and the 24-h Migraine Quality of Life Questionnaire (24-h MqoLQ), addressing various dimensions of QoL [10][11]. Finally, the HEADWORK questionnaire[12] was validated on migraine patients, although deemed to be feasible to address work-related problems of other headache patients.
- QUOTE: Published results are mostly connected to migraine, and more specifically to chronic migraine (CM), and obtained through the use of few assessment instruments, namely the Migraine Disability Assessment scale (MIDAS)[1], the six-Item Headache Impact Test (HIT-6)[2], and the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ) [3]. There is a lack of information about TTH and poor information about cluster headache (CH) [4], a condition in which most of research was designed using again the HIT-6, MIDAS, and the MSQ(...)
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Stewart, W.F.; Lipton, R.B.; Kolodner, K.; Liberman, J.; Sawyer, J. "Reliability of the Migraine Disability Assessment Score in A Population-Based Sample of Headache Sufferers". Cephalalgia 1999, 19, 107–114.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Kosinski, M.R.; Bayliss, M.; Bjorner, J.; Ware, J.E., Jr.; Garber, W.; Batenhorst, A.; Cady, R.; Dahlöf, C.; Dowson, A.; Tepper, S. A six-item short-form survey for measuring headache impact: The HIT-6™. Qual. Life Res. 2003, 12, 963–974.
- ↑ 3.0 3.1 Martin, B.C.; Pathak, D.S.; Sharfman, M.I.; Adelman, J.U.; Taylor, F.R.; Kwong, W.J.; Jhingran, P. Validity and reliability of the migraine-specific quality of life questionnaire (MSQ Version 2.1). Headache J. Head Face Pain 2000, 40, 204–216.
- ↑ D’Amico, D.; Raggi, A.; Grazzi, L.; Lambru, G. Disability, Quality of Life, and Socioeconomic Burden of Cluster Headache: A Critical Review of Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2020, 60, 809–818.
- ↑ Üstün, T.B.; Chatterji, S.; Kostanjsek, N.; Rehm, J.; Kennedy, C.; Epping-Jordan, J.; Saxena, S.; Von Korff, M.; Pull, C. Developing the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Bull. World Health Organ. 2010, 88, 815–823.
- ↑ Garin, O.; Ayuso, J.L.; Almansa, J.; Nieto, M.; Chatterji, S.; Vilagut, G.; Alonso, J.; Cieza, A.; Svestkova, O.; Burger, H.; et al. chronic diseases. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2010, 8, 51.
- ↑ Ware, J.J. SF-36 Health Survey. Manual and Interpretation Guide; The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston, MA, USA, 1993.
- ↑ Kawata, A.K.; Hareendran, A.; Shaffer, S.; Mannix, S.; Thach, A.; Desai, P.; Mikol, D.D.; Ortmeier, B.; Bayliss, M.; Buse, D.C. Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ). Headache J. Head Face Pain 2019, 59, 1253–1269.
- ↑ Kawata, A.K.; Hsieh, R.; Bender, R.; Shaffer, S.; Revicki, D.A.; Bayliss, M.; Buse, D.C.; Desai, P.; Sapra, S.; Ortmeier, B.; et al. Psychometric Evaluation of a Novel Instrument Assessing the Impact of Migraine on Physical Functioning: The Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary. Headache J. Head Face Pain 2017, 57, 1385–1398.
- ↑ Hartmaier, S.L.; Santanello, N.C.; Epstein, R.S.; Silberstein, S.D. Development of a Brief 24-Hour Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. Headache J. Head Face Pain 1995, 35, 320–329.
- ↑ Santanello, N.C.; Hartmaier, S.L.; Epstein, R.S.; Silberstein, S.D. Validation of a New Quality of Life Questionnaire for Acute Migraine Headache. Headache J. Head Face Pain 1995, 35, 330–337.
- ↑ Raggi, A.; Covelli, V.; Guastafierro, E.; Leonardi, M.; Scaratti, C.; Grazzi, L.; Bartolini, M.; Viticchi, G.; Cevoli, S.; Pierangeli, G.; et al. Validation of a self-reported instrument to assess work-related difficulties in patients with migraine: The HEADWORK questionnaire. J. Headache Pain 2018, 19, 85.
2019
- (Kawata et al., 2019) ⇒ Ariane K. Kawata, Asha Hareendran, Shannon Shaffer, Sally Mannix, Andrew Thach, Pooja Desai, Daniel D. Mikol, Brian Ortmeier, Martha Bayliss, Dawn C. Buse (2019). "Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ)". In: Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 59(8), 1253-1269.
- QUOTE: Several PRO instruments exist that measure migraine-related disability, burden, and impact, such as the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6TM), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ). However, a review showed that these instruments had limited coverage of some of the multifaceted impacts of migraine on functioning, that are relevant to adults, particularly the key facets of physical functioning(...)
The Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ) was developed to address the gaps in existing PROs, specifically by providing a method to capture the comprehensive impact of migraine in the past 7 days on Physical Function (PF); Usual Activities (UA); Social Function (SF), and Emotional Function (EF). A 7-day recall period was selected to capture the variability of migraine symptoms and impacts, while being less burdensome than a daily assessment and reducing potential recall bias associated with longer recall intervals. The initial MFIQ items were generated based on concept elicitation interviews with patients, and content validity was further confirmed via cognitive interviews. Clinical experts in migraine also provided input in the development and finalization of the MFIQ. Items use a 5-point response scale. For items relating to concepts/activity that may not be relevant to the subject during a particular week (eg, “ability to take care of your family),” a “does not apply” response option can be used.
The MFIQ was developed for use in clinical trials and other research settings. It has recently been used in trials evaluating an investigational migraine preventive therapy and a prospective observational survey of migraine preventive treatment. The MFIQ has also been translated into 20 languages following best practice recommendations for linguistic validation of PRO instruments. The MFIQ has also been noted in the recently published “Guidelines of the International Headache Society for controlled trials of preventive treatment of chronic migraine in adults” as a PRO tool that can be used to support secondary endpoints in clinical trials of preventive treatments for migraine.
- QUOTE: Several PRO instruments exist that measure migraine-related disability, burden, and impact, such as the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6TM), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), and Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MSQ). However, a review showed that these instruments had limited coverage of some of the multifaceted impacts of migraine on functioning, that are relevant to adults, particularly the key facets of physical functioning(...)
2018
- (Kawata et al., 2018) ⇒ Asha Hareendran, Anne Skalicky, Sally Mannix, Sara Lavoie, Pooja Desai, Martha Bayliss, Andrew V. Thach, Daniel D. Mikol, and Dawn C. Buse (2018). [https://headachejournal.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/head.13420wiley.com/doi/10.1111/head.13569 "Development of a New Tool for Evaluating the Benefit of Preventive Treatments for Migraine on Functional Outcomes – The Migraine Functional Impact QuestionnHeadache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain, 58(10), 1612-1628.
- QUOTE: This paper describes the development of a novel migraine instrument for adults, the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ), which captures the impact of migraine on physical, social, and emotional functioning.
It should be noted that a separate study was conducted for collecting data for item analyses, to inform item reduction to develop the final version of the MFIQ, scoring, and the assessment of reliability, validity, and responsiveness to change. Results will be reported separately. A related daily diary instrument, the Migraine Physical Function Impact Diary (MPFID), which assesses the impact of migraine on physical functioning in the past 24 hours was developed in parallel to the MFIQ [1], [2] and has been included in global clinical trials. Both measures were developed following methods described in the FDA PRO guidance[3].
- QUOTE: This paper describes the development of a novel migraine instrument for adults, the Migraine Functional Impact Questionnaire (MFIQ), which captures the impact of migraine on physical, social, and emotional functioning.
- ↑ Mannix S, Oko-Osi H, Gleeson S, et al. The migraine physical function impact diary: Content validity of a new instrument to evaluate the benefit of preventive migraine treatments. 5th European headache and migraine trust international congress, Glasgow, Scotland; 2016.
- ↑ Kawata AK, Hsieh R, Hareendran A, et al. Evaluating the measurement properties of a new instrument-the migraine physical function impact diary (MPFID) (P2. 156). Neurology. 2017;88:P2-156.
- ↑ Food Drug Administration (FDA). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Fed Regist. 2009;74:65132-65133.