Illiberal Democracy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
An Illiberal Democracy is a democratic state that has significant faults in some democratic metrics (such as a EIU democracy metric).
- Example(s):
- Hungary under Prime Minister Viktor Orbán
- Poland under the Law and Justice Party (PiS)
- Turkey under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
- The U.S.A (~2019)?
- …
- Counter-Example(s):
- a Full Democracy.
- an Illiberal Autocracy, with an Authoritarian Regime.
- See: Constitution, Guided Democracy, Civil Liberties, Open Society, EIU Democracy Index.
References
2020
Listing by country is available on The Economist website.[1]
Rank | Country | Score | Electoral process and pluralism |
FunctioTemplate:Shyning of governTemplate:Shyment |
Political particiTemplate:Shypation |
Political culture |
Civil liberties |
Regime type |
Region[n 1] | Changes from last year |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
23 | KOR | 8.00 | 9.17 | 7.86 | 7.22 | 7.50 | 8.24 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | Score: Template:Steady Rank: Template:Decrease 2 |
24 | JPN | 7.99 | 8.75 | 8.21 | 6.67 | 7.50 | 8.82 | Flawed democracy | Asia & Australasia | |
25 | USA | 7.96 | 9.17 | 7.14 | 7.78 | 7.50 | 8.24 | Flawed democracy | North America | Score: Template:Steady Rank: Template:Steady |
26 | MLT | 7.95 | 9.17 | 7.50 | 6.11 | 8.13 | 8.82 | Flawed democracy | Western Europe | Score: Template:Decrease 0.26 Rank: Template:Decrease 8 |
27 | EST | 7.90 | 9.58 | 7.86 | 6.67 | 6.88 | 8.53 | Flawed democracy | Eastern Europe | Score: Template:Decrease 0.07 Rank: Template:Decrease 4 |
2020
- (Wikipedia, 2020) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illiberal_democracy Retrieved:2020-8-8.
- An illiberal democracy, also called a partial democracy, flawed democracy, low intensity democracy, empty democracy or guided democracy, [2] is a governing system in which although elections take place, citizens are cut off from knowledge about the activities of those who exercise real power because of the lack of civil liberties; thus it is not an “open society". There are many countries "that are categorized as neither 'free' nor 'not free', but as 'probably free', falling somewhere between democratic and nondemocratic regimes". [3] This may be because a constitution limiting government powers exists, but those in power ignore its liberties, or because an adequate legal constitutional framework of liberties does not exist.
- ↑ "Democracy Index 2019 A year of democratic setbacks and popular protest". https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=democracyindex2019. Retrieved 24 January 2020.
- ↑ Juan Carlos Calleros, Calleros-Alarcó, The Unifinished Transition to Democracy in Latin America, Routledge, 2009, p. 1
- ↑ O'Neil, Patrick. Essentials of Comparative Politics. 3rd ed. New York, New York, W. W Norton & Company, 2010. pp. 162–63. Print.
2020
- (Wikipedia, 2020) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy_Index#Classification_definitions Retrieved:2020-8-8.
- Flawed democracies are nations where elections are fair and free and basic civil liberties are honoured but may have issues (e.g. media freedom infringement and minor suppression of political opposition and critics). These nations have significant faults in other democratic aspects, including underdeveloped political culture, low levels of participation in politics, and issues in the functioning of governance.
2016
- (Piketty, 2016b) ⇒ Thomas Piketty. (2016b) . “We must rethink globalization, or Trumpism will prevail.” In: The Guardian.
- QUOTE: Trump’s victory is primarily due to the explosion in economic and geographic inequality in the United States over several decades and the inability of successive governments to deal with this. Both the Clinton and the Obama administrations frequently went along with the market liberalization launched under Reagan and both Bush presidencies. At times they even outdid them …
… globalization must be fundamentally re-oriented. The main challenges of our times are the rise in inequality and global warming. We must therefore implement international treaties enabling us to respond to these challenges and to promote a model for fair and sustainable development.
- QUOTE: Trump’s victory is primarily due to the explosion in economic and geographic inequality in the United States over several decades and the inability of successive governments to deal with this. Both the Clinton and the Obama administrations frequently went along with the market liberalization launched under Reagan and both Bush presidencies. At times they even outdid them …
Cite error: <ref>
tags exist for a group named "n", but no corresponding <references group="n"/>
tag was found