Artificial Intelligence (AI) Benchmark Task
(Redirected from Benchmark for AI System)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
An Artificial Intelligence (AI) Benchmark Task is an AI task that serves as a benchmark task to measure and compare the performance of different AI models or systems.
- Context:
- It can range from being a Narrow AI Benchmark (such as language understanding benchmark) to being a General AI Benchmark.
- It can range from being a Specialized AI Benchmark (e.g., MMLU Benchmark) to being a Multi-Modal Benchmark that integrates diverse input types (e.g., Task Me Anything Benchmark).
- It can range from being a Static Benchmark (where inputs are fixed) to being a Dynamic Benchmark, where environments and inputs change based on context (e.g., ActPlan-1K Benchmark).
- It can offer meaningful comparisons across various AI Models, AI Systems, and AI Techniques.
- It can help identify strengths and weaknesses of different AI Approaches.
- It can provide standardized Datasets and Evaluation Metrics to ensure consistent and fair comparison of AI Models.
- It can drive advancements in AI Research by highlighting areas where current AI Models fall short and encouraging the development of more robust and capable systems.
- ...
- Example(s):
- Computer Vision AI Benchmarks, such as:
- An ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC), which is used in the field of computer vision.
- The COCO (Common Objects in Context) Dataset, used for object detection, segmentation, and captioning in images.
- Natural Language Processing AI Benchmarks, such as:
- An LLM Benchmarking Task, such as an MMLU benchmark.
- An NLP Benchmarking Task, such as a SQuAD (Stanford Question Answering Dataset).
- The General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE) benchmark, used for evaluating natural language understanding models.
- The SuperGLUE Benchmark, an improvement over GLUE for more challenging natural language understanding tasks.
- The Hugging Face Model Evaluations, which provide a comprehensive comparison of transformer models on a wide range of tasks.
- HaluEval Benchmark.
- General AI Benchmarks, such as Turing Tests, which is a measure of a machine's ability to demonstrate human-like intelligence.
- Robustness and Performance AI Benchmarks, such as:
- The RobustBench Benchmark, which evaluates the robustness of AI models to adversarial attacks.
- The MLPerf Benchmark, which measures the performance of machine learning hardware, software, and services.
- AI Agent Benchmarking Tasks.
- Edge and Mobile AI Benchmarks, which evaluates the performance of AI models on mobile and edge devices.
- Procedural Planning Benchmarks, such as:
- The ActPlan-1K Benchmark, which evaluates the procedural planning abilities of visual language models (VLMs) on simulated household activities.
- Multimodal AI Benchmarks, such as:
- The Task Me Anything Benchmark, which programmatically generates diverse tasks combining visual, relational, and attribute-based benchmarks for multimodal AI systems.
- Reasoning Benchmark, such as:
- AI Coding Benchmarks, such as:
- ...
- Computer Vision AI Benchmarks, such as:
- Counter-Example(s):
- An Olympic Event, which is a competition among humans, not AI systems.
- A Cooking Contest, which evaluates human culinary skills rather than AI capabilities.
- See: Software Benchmark, ML Benchmark, Performance Metric, Evaluation Framework, AI Agent
References
2024
- (Chan, Chowdhury et al., 2024) ⇒ Jun Shern Chan, Neil Chowdhury, Oliver Jaffe, James Aung, Dane Sherburn, Evan Mays, Giulio Starace, Kevin Liu, Leon Maksin, Tejal Patwardhan, Lilian Weng, and Aleksander Mądry. (2024). “MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering.”
- NOTES:
- The paper introduces a comprehensive framework for evaluating Autonomous AI Agents in complex Machine Learning Engineering (MLE) tasks using a benchmark of 75 curated Kaggle competitions.
- The paper designs and implements a novel Benchmark for AI Systems, measuring agent capabilities in training, debugging, and optimizing machine learning models.
- NOTES: