2002 ThreeWorldsofWelfare...

From GM-RKB
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Subject Headings: comparative social policy analysis, typology, welfare state regimes, worlds of welfare capitalism.

Notes

Cited By

Quotes

Abstract

This paper surveys the debate regarding Esping-Andersen's typology of welfare states and reviews the modified or alternative typologies ensuing from this debate. We confine ourselves to the classifications which have been developed by Esping-Andersen's critics in order to cope with the following alleged shortcomings of his typology: (1) the misspecification of the Mediterranean welfare states as immature Continental ones; (2) the labelling of the Antipodean welfare states as belonging to the `liberal' regime type; (3) a neglect of the gender-dimension in social policy. We reconstruct several typologies of welfare states in order to establish, first, whether real welfare states are quite similar to others or whether they are rather unique specimens, and, second, whether there are three ideal-typical worlds of welfare capitalism or more. We conclude that real welfare states are hardly ever pure types and are usually hybrid cases; and that the issue of ideal-typical welfare states cannot be satisfactorily answered given the lack of formal theorizing and the still inconclusive outcomes of comparative research. In spite of this conclusion there is plenty of reason to continue to work on and with the original or modified typologies.

References

  • Abrahamson, P. (1999) ‘The Welfare Modelling Business’, Social Policy & Administration 33 (4): 394–415.
  • Arts, W. A. and Gelissen, J. (1999) ‘Verzorgingsstaten in soorten: Op zoek naar ideaalen reële typen’, Mens & Maatschappij 74(2): 143–65.
  • Arts, W. A. and Gelissen, J. (2001) ‘Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?’ Acta Sociologica 44 (4):283–300.
  • Baldwin, P. (1996) ‘Can We Define a European Welfare State Model?’, in B. Greve (ed.) Comparative Welfare Systems: the Scandinavian Model in a Period of Change, pp. 29–44. London: Macmillan.
  • Becker, U. (1996) ‘Over de typologie van welvaartsbestellen: Esping-Andersens theorie in discussie’, Beleid & Maatschappij 23 (1): 19–30.
  • Boje, T. (1996) ‘Welfare State Models in Comparative Research: Do the Models Describe the Reality?’, in B. Greve (ed.) Comparative Welfare Systems: the Scandinavian Model in a Period of Change, pp. 13–27. London: Macmillan Press.
  • Bonoli, G. (1997) ‘Classifying Welfare States: a Two-dimension Approach’, Journal of Social Policy 26 (3): 351–72.
  • Bulmer, M. and Rees, A. M. (1996) ‘Conclusion: Citizenship in the Twenty-first Century’, in M. Bulmer and A. M. Rees (eds) Citizenship Today. The Contemporary Relevance of T. H. Marshall, pp. 269–84. London: UCL Press.
  • Castles, F. G. (1993) ‘Introduction’, in F. G. Castles (ed.) Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
  • Castles, F. G. (1998) Comparative Public Policy: Patterns of Post-war Transformation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Castles, F. G. and Mitchell, D. (1993) ‘Worlds of Welfare and Families of Nations’, in F. G. Castles (ed.) Families of Nations: Patterns of Public Policy in Western Democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.
  • Cnaan, R. A. (1992) ‘Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism’, Acta Sociologica 35 (1): 69–71.
  • Daly, M. and Lewis, J. (2000) ‘The Concept of Social Care and the Analysis of Contemporary Welfare States’, British Journal of Sociology 51 (2): 281–98.
  • de Swaan, A. (1988) In Care of the State: Health Care, Education and Welfare in Europe and the USA in the Modern Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1993) ‘The Comparative Macro-sociology of Welfare States’, in L. Moreno (ed.) Social Exchange and Welfare Development, pp. 123–36. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1994) ‘Welfare States and the Economy’, in N. J. Smelser and R. Swedberg (eds) The Handbook of Economic Sociology, pp. 711–32. Princeton/New York: Princeton University Press/Russel Sage Foundation.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1996) ‘Welfare States without Work: the Impasse of Labour Shedding and Familialism in Continental European Social Policy’, in G. Esping-Andersen (ed.) Welfare States in Transition, pp. 66–87. London: Sage.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1997) ‘Hybrid or Unique? The Japanese Welfare State between Europe and America’, Journal of European Social Policy 7 (3): 179–89.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Post-industrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Esping-Andersen, G. and Korpi, W. (1984) ‘Social Policy as Class Politics in Post-war Capitalism’, in J. Goldthorpe (ed.) Order and Conflict in Contemporary Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ferrera, M. (1996) ‘The “Southern” Model of Welfare in Social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy 6 (1): 17–37.
  • Marshall, T. H. (1965) Social Policy. London: Hutchinson.
  • Marshall, T. H. (1981) The Right to Welfare and other Essays. London: Heinemann.
  • Mommsen, W. J. (1981) The Emergence of the Welfare State in Britain and Germany. London: Croom Helm.
  • [Obinger, H.]] and Wagschal, U. (1998) ‘Das Stratifizierungskonzept in der Clusteranalytischen Überprüfung’, in S. Lessenich and I. Ostner (eds) Welten des Wohlfahrtskapitalismus: Der Sozialstaat in vergleichender Perspektive, pp. 109–35. Frankfurt/Main: Campus Verlag.
  • O’Connor, J. S. (1993) ‘Gender, Class and Citizenship in the Comparative Analysis of Welfare State Regimes: Theoretical and Methodological Issues’, The British Journal of Sociology 44 (3): 501–18.
  • O’Connor, J. S., Orloff, A. and Shaver, S. (1999) States, Markets, Families. Gender, Liberalism and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Offe, C. (1991) ‘The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism’, American Journal of Sociology 96 (6): 1,555–7.
  • Orloff, A. S. (1993) ‘Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: a Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States’, American Sociological Review 58 (3): 303–28.
  • Papadakis, E. and Bean, C. (1993) ‘Popular Support for the Welfare State: a Comparison among Institutional Regimes’, Journal of Public Policy 13 (3): 227–54.
  • Peillon, M. (1996) ‘A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Welfare State Legitimacy’, Journal of European Social Policy 6 (3): 175–90.
  • Pierson, P. (1993) ‘When Effect becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change’, World Politics 45 (4): 595–628.
  • Ragin, C. (1994) ‘A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Pension Systems’, in T. Janoski and A. M. Hicks (eds) The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State, pp. 320–45. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Rogers, R. E. (1969) Max Weber’s Ideal Type Theory. New York: Philosophical Library.
  • Sainsbury, D. (1996) Gender, Equality and Welfare States. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
  • Schmidt, M. G. (1998) Sozialpolitik in Deutschland: Historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich. Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
  • Shalev, M. (1996) The Privatization of Social Policy? Occupational Welfare and the Welfare State in America, Scandinavia and Japan. London: Macmillan.
  • Siaroff, A. (1994) ‘Work, Welfare and Gender Equality: a New Typology’, in D. Sainsbury (ed.) Gendering Welfare States, pp. 82–100. London: Sage.
  • Svallfors, S. (1997) ‘Worlds of Welfare and Attitudes to Redistribution: a Comparison of Eight Western Nations’, European Sociological Review 13 (3): 283–304.
  • Therborn, G. (1995) European Modernity and Beyond. The Trajectory of European Societies 1945–2000. London: Sage.
  • Titmuss, R. (1958) Essays on the Welfare State. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Titmuss, R. (1974) Social Policy. London: Allen & Unwin.
  • Trifiletti, R. (1999) ‘Southern European Welfare Regimes and the Worsening Position of Women’, Journal of European Social Policy 9 (1): 49–64.
  • van Kersbergen, K. (1995) Social Capitalism: a Study of Christian Democracy and the Welfare State. London: Routledge.
  • Visser, J. and Hemerijck, A. C. (1997) A Dutch Miracle: Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • von Kempski, J. (1972) ‘Zur Logik der Ordungsbegriffe, besonders in den Sozialwissenschaften’, in H. Albert (ed.) Theorie un d Realität. Ausgewählte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre der Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 115–38. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  • Watkins, J. W. N. (1969) [1953] ‘Methodological Individualism and Non-Hempelian Ideal Types’, in L. J. Kimmerman (ed.) The Nature and Scope of Social Science: a Critical Anthology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Weber, M. (1949) The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Weber, M. (1968) [1922] Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).
  • Wildeboer Schut, J. M., Vrooman, J. C. and de Beer, P. (2001) On Worlds of Welfare. Institutions and their Effects in Eleven Welfare States. The Hague: Social and Cultural Planning Office of the Netherlands.
  • Wilensky, H. L. (1975) The Welfare State and Equality: Structural and Ideological Roots of Public Expenditures. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

,

 AuthorvolumeDate ValuetitletypejournaltitleUrldoinoteyear
2002 ThreeWorldsofWelfare...Wil Arts
John Gelissen
Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism or More? A state-of-the-art reporthttp://ritsumei-gssgp.jp/sansyagp/lecture/lecture-pdf/Chris-Grover/090507Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more A state-of-the-art report Journal of European Social Policy.pdf