W. D. Ross (1877-1971)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
W. D. Ross (1877-1971) was a person.
- AKA: David Ross.
- See: Analytic Philosophy, Deontology, Ethics Philosopher, Philosopher.
References
2015
- (Wikipedia, 2015) ⇒ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._D._Ross Retrieved:2015-11-21.
- Sir William David Ross KBE FBA (15 April 1877 – 5 May 1971), known as David Ross but usually cited as W. D. Ross, was a Scottish philosopher who is known for his work in ethics. His best-known work is The Right and the Good (1930), and he is perhaps best known for developing a pluralist, deontological form of intuitionist ethics in response to G.E. Moore's intuitionism. Ross also critically edited and translated a number of Aristotle's works, in addition to writing on Greek philosophy.
2010
- http://www.bbc.co.uk/ethics/introduction/duty_1.shtml
- QUOTE: Kantian ethics seems pretty uncompromising and not really suited to the untidiness of many moral choices that people have to make. The 20th Century philosopher W. D. Ross (Sir David Ross) (1877-1971) suggested that it would be helpful to look at two kinds of duty: Prima facie duties and Actual duties.
1930
- (Ross, 1930) ⇒ William D. Ross. (1930). “The Right and the Good." Philip Stratton-Lake
- BOOK REVIEW: The Right and the Good is a classic of 20th‐century philosophy by the great scholar Sir David Ross, which is now presented in a new edition with a substantial introduction by Philip Stratton–Lake, a leading expert on Ross. Ross's book was originally published in 1930, and is the pinnacle of ethical intuitionism, which was the dominant moral theory in British philosophy for much of the 19th and early 20th century. The central concern of the book is with rightness and goodness, and their relation to one another. Ross argues against notable rival ethical theories. The right act, he holds, cannot be derived from the moral value of the motive from which it is done; furthermore, rightness is not wholly determined by the value of the consequences of one's action, whether this value is some benefit for the agent, or some agent‐neutral good. Rather, the right act is determined by a plurality of self‐evident prima facie duties. Ross portrayed rightness and goodness as simple non‐natural properties.