Social Psychology Analysis
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Social Psychology Analysis is a psychological analysis of how people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others.
- See: Group Dynamics, Psychology, Science, Thought, Feeling, Behavior, Norm (Sociology), Human Behavior.
References
2015
- (Wikipedia, 2015) ⇒ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/social_psychology Retrieved:2015-11-28.
- In psychology, social psychology is the scientific study of how people's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by the actual, imagined, or implied presence of others. [1] In this definition, scientific refers to the empirical method of investigation. The terms thoughts, feelings, and behaviors include all psychological variables that are measurable in a human being. The statement that others' presence may be imagined or implied suggests that we are prone to social influence even when no other people are present, such as when watching television, or following internalized cultural norms. Social psychologists typically explain human behavior as a result of the interaction of mental states and immediate social situations. Social psychologists therefore deal with the factors that lead us to behave in a given way in the presence of others, and look at the conditions under which certain behavior/actions and feelings occur. Social psychology is concerned with the way these feelings, thoughts, beliefs, intentions and goals are constructed and how such psychological factors, in turn, influence our interactions with others. Social psychology is a discipline that had traditionally bridged the gap between psychology and sociology. During the years immediately following World War II there was frequent collaboration between psychologists and sociologists. However, the two disciplines have become increasingly specialized and isolated from each other in recent years, with sociologists focusing on "macro variables" (e.g., social structure) to a much greater extent. Nevertheless, sociological approaches to social psychology remain an important counterpart to psychological research in this area. In addition to the split between psychology and sociology, there has been a somewhat less pronounced difference in emphasis between American social psychologists and European social psychologists. As a generalization, American researchers traditionally have focused more on the individual, whereas Europeans have paid more attention to group level phenomena (see group dynamics).
- ↑ p.5
2002
- (Fiske et al., 2002) ⇒ Susan T. Fiske, Amy J.C. Cuddy, Peter Glick, and Jun Xu. (2002). “A Model of (often Mixed) Stereotype Content: Competence and Warmth Respectively Follow from Perceived Status and Competition..” In: Journal of personality and social psychology, 82(6). doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
- QUOTE: However, social psychology of late has eschewed the study of stereotype content, focusing instead on stereotyping processes (for reviews, see Brown, 1995; Fiske, 1998; Leyens, Yzerbyt, & Schadron, 1994; Macrae & Bodenhausen, 2000). And for good reason.
2003
- (Aronson, 2003) ⇒ Elliot Aronson. (2003). “The Social Animal." Worth Publishers. ISBN:9780716757153
1974
- (Milgram, 1974) ⇒ Stanley Milgram. (1974). “Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View." Harper & Row.