Pairwise Semantic Similarity Measure
(Redirected from Pairwise SSM)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Pairwise Semantic Similarity Measure is a Topological Semantic Similarity Measure that calculates similarities between two ontological instances by combining the semantic similarities of the concepts that they represent.
- Context:
- It can range from being a Pairwise (All-Pairs) Semantic Similarity Measure to being a Pairwise (Best-Pairs) Semantic Similarity Measure.
- Example(s):
- Counter-Example(s):
- See: Semantic Similarity Neural Network, Ontology-based Semantic Similarity Measure, Statistical Semantic Similarity, Semantic Word Similarity Measure.
References
2021
- (Wikipedia, 2021) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_similarity#Topological_similarity Retrieved:2021-8-7.
- There are essentially two types of approaches that calculate topological similarity between ontological concepts:
- Edge-based: which use the edges and their types as the data source;
- Node-based: in which the main data sources are the nodes and their properties.
- Other measures calculate the similarity between ontological instances:
- Pairwise: measure functional similarity between two instances by combining the semantic similarities of the concepts they represent
- Groupwise: calculate the similarity directly not combining the semantic similarities of the concepts they represent
- There are essentially two types of approaches that calculate topological similarity between ontological concepts:
2009
- (Pesquita et al., 2009 ) ⇒ Catia Pesquita, Daniel Faria, Andre O. Falcao, Phillip Lord, and Francisco M. Couto (2009). "Semantic Similarity in Biomedical Ontologies". In: PLoS Computational Biology 5(7): e1000443.
- QUOTE: Pairwise approaches measure functional similarity between two gene products by combining the semantic similarities between their terms. Each gene product is represented by its set of direct annotations, and semantic similarity is calculated between terms in one set and terms in the other (using one of the approaches described previously for comparing terms). Some approaches consider every pairwise combination of terms from the two sets (all pairs technique), while others consider only the best-matching pair for each term (best pairs technique). A global functional similarity score between the gene products is obtained by combining these pairwise semantic similarities, with the most common combination approaches being the average, the maximum, and the sum.
(...)
- QUOTE: Pairwise approaches measure functional similarity between two gene products by combining the semantic similarities between their terms. Each gene product is represented by its set of direct annotations, and semantic similarity is calculated between terms in one set and terms in the other (using one of the approaches described previously for comparing terms). Some approaches consider every pairwise combination of terms from the two sets (all pairs technique), while others consider only the best-matching pair for each term (best pairs technique). A global functional similarity score between the gene products is obtained by combining these pairwise semantic similarities, with the most common combination approaches being the average, the maximum, and the sum.
Measure | Approach | Techniques | Term Comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Lord et al. (2003) | All pairs | Average | Resnik/Lin/Jiang |
Sevilla et al. (2005) | All pairs | Maximum | Resnik/Lin/Jiang |
Riensche et al., (2007, XOA) | All pairs | Maximum | XOA |
Azuaje et al. (2005) | Best pairs | Average | Resnik/Lin/Jiang |
Couto et al. (2005) | Best pairs | Average | GraSM+(Resnik/Lin/Jiang) |
Schlicker et al. (2006, funSim) | Best pairs | Average | simRel |
Wang et al. (2007) | Best pairs | Average | Wang |
Tao et al. (2007) (ITSS) | Best pairs | Average Min. threshold | Lin |
Pozo et al. (2008) | Best pairs | Average | Pozo |
Lei et al. (2006) | All pairs Best pairsa | Average Max, Sum | Depth of LCA |
2008
- (Pozo et al., 2008) ⇒ Angela del Pozo, Florencio Pazos, and Alfonso Valencia (2008). "Defining functional distances over gene ontology". In: BMC Bioinformatics, 9, Article number: 50.
2007a
- (Riensche et al., 2007) ⇒ Roderick M. Riensche, Bob L. Baddeley, Antonio P. Sanfilippo, Christian Posse, and Banu Gopalan (2007)."XOA: Web-Enabled Cross-Ontological Analytics". In: 2007 IEEE Congress on Services.
2007b
- (Tao et al., 2007) ⇒ Ying Tao, Lee Sam, Jianrong Li, Carol Friedman, Yves A. Lussier (2007). "Information theory applied to the sparse gene ontology annotation network to predict novel gene function". In: Bioinformatics, Volume 23, Issue 13.
2007c
- (Wang et al., 2007) ⇒ James Z. Wang, Zhidian Du, Rapeeporn Payattakool, Philip S. Yu, and Chin-Fu Chen (2007). "A new method to measure the semantic similarity of GO terms"In: Bioinformatics 23 (10).
2006a
- (Lei & Dai, 2006) ⇒Zhengdeng Lei, and Yang Dai (2006). "Assessing protein similarity with gene ontology and its use in subnuclear localization prediction". In: BMC Bioinformatics, 7: 491.
2006b
- (Schlicker et al., 2006) ⇒ Andreas Schlicker, Francisco S. Domingues, Jorg Rahnenfuhrer, and Thomas Lengauer (2006) ⇒ "A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on Gene Ontology. In: BMC Bioinformatics 7: 302.
2005a
- (Azuaje et al., 2005) ⇒ Francisco Azuaje, Haiying Wang, and Olivier Bodenreider (2005). "Ontology-driven similarity approaches to supporting gene functional assessment". In: Proceedings of the ISMB 2005 SIG meeting on Bio-ontologies.
2005b
- (Couto et al., 2005) ⇒ Francisco M. Couto, Mario J. Silva, and Pedro Coutinho (2005). "Semantic Similarity over the Gene Ontology: Family Correlation and Selecting Disjunctive Ancestors". In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference in Information and Knowledge Management (ACM-CIKM 2005).
2005c
- (Sevilla et al., 2005) ⇒ J.L. Sevilla, V. Segura, A. Podhorski, E. Guruceaga, J.M. Mato, L.A. Martinez-Cruz, F.J. Corrales and A. Rubio (2005). "Correlation between gene expression and go semantic similarity". In: IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics.
2004
- (Cheng et al., 2004) ⇒ Jill Cheng, Melissa Cline, John Martin, David Finkelstein, Tarif Awad, David Kulp, and Michael A. Siani-Rose (2004). "A Knowledge-Based Clustering Algorithm Driven by Gene Ontology". In: Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 14(3), 687-700.
- QUOTE: To quantify the relationship between two GO tiodes, we calculate a pair-wise similarity score according to the number of edges two nodes share In their respective paths to the root of the hierarchy. Only the edges that are common to both paths are significant; the edges below their lowest-level common ancestor do not contribute to similarity. Because of multiple inheritance, one node may have multiple parents and may reside in multiple paths, We took a greedy approach, representing the similarity between two nodes as their longest common partial path from the root.
2003
- (Lord et al., 2003) ⇒ P. W. Lord, R. D. Stevens, A. Brass, and C. A. Goble (2003). "Investigating semantic similarity measures across the Gene Ontology: the relationship between sequence and annotation". In: Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1275–1283.