Grand State Strategy

A Grand State Strategy is a state strategy that focuses on advancing and achieving long-term national interests.

• Example(s):
  • A Grand State Strategy of Primacy: aims to maintain the state as the dominant power in the international system. It is characterized by a strong military, a robust economy, and a network of alliances. Examples of primacy strategies include the United States' post-World War II grand strategy and the United Kingdom's grand strategy in the 19th century.
  • A Grand State Strategy of Offshore balancing: aims to maintain the state's security by preventing the emergence of a hegemon in its region. It is characterized by a focus on naval power, a limited use of ground forces, and a willingness to let allies bear the brunt of the burden in regional conflicts. Examples of offshore balancing strategies include the United States' grand strategy in the interwar period and the United Kingdom's grand strategy in the 20th century.
  • A Grand State Strategy of Contingency planning: aims to prepare the state for a variety of possible future scenarios, both good and bad. It is characterized by a focus on flexibility, adaptability, and resilience. Examples of contingency planning strategies include the United States' grand strategy in the Cold War and the Swiss grand strategy.
  • A Grand State Strategy of Retrenchment: aims to reduce the state's commitments and focus on its own security. It is characterized by a focus on economic development, a limited military, and a willingness to let others take the lead in international affairs. Examples of retrenchment strategies include the United States' grand strategy in the late 19th century and the Japanese grand strategy in the interwar period.
  • A Grand State Strategy of Revisionism: aims to change the status quo in the international system in the state's favor. It is characterized by a willingness to use military force and diplomacy to achieve its goals. Examples of revisionist strategies include Germany's grand strategy in the early 20th century and China's grand strategy in the 21st century.
  • …
• See: Isolationism, Military Doctrine, Force Structure, Military Alliance, Diplomacy, Military Strategy, Foreign Policy, Offshore Balancing.

---

---

References

2023

• Web Chatbot
  • A "Grand State Strategy" involves the meticulous planning and organization of a country's long-term objectives through a multi-faceted approach that includes diverse dimensions such as political, economic, military, and psychological aspects. It necessitates the identification of national goals, evaluation of available resources, and then carefully organizing these resources to achieve the set objectives. It transcends simple war winning to securing lasting peace, providing a national vision, and a comprehensive plan to realize that vision.

    The implementation of grand state strategies demands a societal consensus and a concerted effort from a significant portion of the population. In order to be effective, it must be flexible, adaptable to unforeseen events that could shape the economic and political climate of the country. The crafting of such strategies involves a balance of means and ends, establishing practical objectives, and allocating necessary resources.

    Key to forming a successful grand state strategy is the recognition of the quantity and quality of available resources, including manpower, weaponry, and financial capabilities that primarily influence military decisions. Historical and psychological factors also must be taken into consideration.

    The grand strategy of a country can alter significantly in reaction to pivotal global events or shifts in national objectives. Such was the case during the World Wars and the Cold War. For instance, the current United States' grand strategy is largely centered on combatting global terrorism.

    This concept of grand strategy, while it sounds sophisticated, essentially refers to a collection of planned policies a state deploys to further its national interest. It harmonizes ends and means, involving an analysis of the objectives and the constraints. These constraints could range from financial limitations to innate limitations of the tools of statecraft. Sociocultural and cognitive factors can shape worldviews of the leaders too.

    Grand strategy, requiring the interplay of theory and experience, interfaces with several academic disciplines including history, political science, public policy, and economics. Consequently, critical engagement of students in the design, application, and revision of grand strategy necessitates educational reforms. Hence, the study of grand strategies plays an instrumental role in comprehending the choices of leaders, which, in turn, enhances the quality of a nation's grand strategy over time.

2023

• (Wikipedia, 2023) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_strategy Retrieved:2023-11-3.
  • Grand strategy or high strategy is a state's strategy of how means (military and nonmilitary) can be used to advance and achieve national interests in the long-term. Issues of grand strategy typically include the choice of military doctrine, force structure and alliances, as well as economic relations, diplomatic behavior, and methods to extract or mobilize resources. In contrast to strategy, grand strategy encompasses more than military means (such as diplomatic and economic means); does not equate success with purely military victory but also the pursuit of peacetime goals and prosperity; and considers goals and interests in the long-term rather than short-term. In contrast to foreign policy, grand strategy emphasizes the military implications of policy; considers costs benefits of policies, as well as limits on capabilities; establishes priorities; and sets out a practical plan rather than a set of ambitions and wishes. A country's political leadership typically directs grand strategy with input from the most senior military officials. Development of a nation's grand strategy may extend across many years or even multiple generations. Much scholarship on grand strategy focuses on the United States, which has since the end of World War II had a grand strategy oriented around primacy, "deep engagement", and/or liberal hegemony, which entail that the United States maintains military predominance; maintains an extensive network of allies (exemplified by NATO, bilateral alliances and foreign US military bases); and integrates other states into US-designed international institutions (such as the IMF, WTO/GATT and World Bank). Critics of this grand strategy, which includes proponents for offshore balancing, selective engagement, restraint, and isolationism, argue for pulling back.

2023

• Sarah C. M. Paine. (2023). “Sarah C. M. Paine - WW2, Taiwan, Ukraine, & Maritime vs Continental Powers." YouTube Interview by Dwarkesh Patel.
  • NOTES
    • Grand strategy involves coordinating all instruments of national power - military, diplomatic, economic, informational - to achieve a nation's objectives. It provides an overarching framework to integrate policies and institutions. The texts cite examples such as institution building in democracies like the US and UK during WWII.
    • Grand strategy requires accommodating diverse perspectives that may exist within a nation. Unlike dictatorships that can stubbornly persist with flawed strategies, democracies allow new ideas and approaches to emerge through public discourse. However, having no coordinated grand strategy can also be detrimental, as seen with the mismanagement of WWI.
    • Individual mistakes, such as pivotal errors in foreign policy or military strategy, can have immense consequences when made by leaders. These blunders may cause over-extension, loss of resources, and subsequent conflict or invasion. The texts use examples like Japan's attack on Pearl Harbor and Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
    • Economic policies and decisions, such as protective tariffs, can significantly impact a nation like Japan that relies heavily on international trade. Such policies need to be considered from a broader strategic perspective.
    • Maritime powers tend to benefit more from an open global order and trade in comparison to continental powers focused on territorial control. Adopting the appropriate strategic approach aligned with a nation's geographical realities is vital.

---