Trust Emotion
(Redirected from trust emotion)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A Trust Emotion is a positive emotion where one agent (the trustor) accepts the claims of another agent (the trustee).
- Context:
- It can (typically) be instantiated in a Trust Relationship.
- It can (often) be correlated to a Trust Measure.
- It can range from being a Weak Trust Emotion to being a Strong Trust Emotion.
- ...
- Example(s):
- person X trusts that person Y will fulfill their promise.
- a Love Emotion.
- …
- Counter-Example(s):
- See: Confidence Artist, Deception, Honesty, Confidence, Guilt Trip.
References
2016
- (Wikipedia, 2016) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/trust_(emotion) Retrieved:2016-9-29.
- In a social context, trust has several connotations. [1] Definitions of trust [2] [3] typically refer to a situation characterized by the following aspects: One party (trustor) is willing to rely on the actions of another party (trustee); the situation is directed to the future. In addition, the trustor (voluntarily or forcedly) abandons control over the actions performed by the trustee. As a consequence, the trustor is uncertain about the outcome of the other's actions; they can only develop and evaluate expectations. The uncertainty involves the risk of failure or harm to the trustor if the trustee will not behave as desired. Vladimir Ilych Lenin expressed this idea with the sentence "Trust is good, control is better". Trust can be attributed to relationships between people. It can be demonstrated that humans have a natural disposition to trust and to judge trustworthiness that can be traced to the neurobiological structure and activity of a human brain. Some studies indicate that trust can be altered e.g. by the application of oxytocin. [4] Conceptually, trust is also attributable to relationships within and between social groups (history, families, friends, communities, organisations, companies, nations, etc.). It is a popular approach to frame the dynamics of inter-group and intra-group interactions in terms of trust. [5] When it comes to the relationship between people and technology, the attribution of trust is a matter of dispute. The intentional stance [6] demonstrates that trust can be validly attributed to human relationships with complex technologies. However, rational reflection leads to the rejection of an ability to trust technological artefacts. [7] One of the key current challenges in the social sciences is to re-think how the rapid progress of technology has impacted constructs such as trust. This is specifically true for information technology that dramatically alters causation in social systems. [8]
In the social sciences, the subtleties of trust are a subject of ongoing research. In sociology and psychology the degree to which one party trusts another is a measure of belief in the honesty, fairness, or benevolence of another party. The term “confidence” is more appropriate for a belief in the competence of the other party. Based on the most recent research , a failure in trust may be forgiven more easily if it is interpreted as a failure of competence rather than a lack of benevolence or honesty. In economics trust is often conceptualized as reliability in transactions. In all cases trust is a heuristic decision rule, allowing the human to deal with complexities that would require unrealistic effort in rational reasoning.
- In a social context, trust has several connotations. [1] Definitions of trust [2] [3] typically refer to a situation characterized by the following aspects: One party (trustor) is willing to rely on the actions of another party (trustee); the situation is directed to the future. In addition, the trustor (voluntarily or forcedly) abandons control over the actions performed by the trustee. As a consequence, the trustor is uncertain about the outcome of the other's actions; they can only develop and evaluate expectations. The uncertainty involves the risk of failure or harm to the trustor if the trustee will not behave as desired. Vladimir Ilych Lenin expressed this idea with the sentence "Trust is good, control is better". Trust can be attributed to relationships between people. It can be demonstrated that humans have a natural disposition to trust and to judge trustworthiness that can be traced to the neurobiological structure and activity of a human brain. Some studies indicate that trust can be altered e.g. by the application of oxytocin. [4] Conceptually, trust is also attributable to relationships within and between social groups (history, families, friends, communities, organisations, companies, nations, etc.). It is a popular approach to frame the dynamics of inter-group and intra-group interactions in terms of trust. [5] When it comes to the relationship between people and technology, the attribution of trust is a matter of dispute. The intentional stance [6] demonstrates that trust can be validly attributed to human relationships with complex technologies. However, rational reflection leads to the rejection of an ability to trust technological artefacts. [7] One of the key current challenges in the social sciences is to re-think how the rapid progress of technology has impacted constructs such as trust. This is specifically true for information technology that dramatically alters causation in social systems. [8]
- ↑ McKnight, D. H., and Chervany, N. L. (1996). The Meanings of Trust. Scientific report, University of Minnesota.
- ↑ Mayer, R.C., Davis J.H., Schoorman F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review. 20 (3), 709-734.
- ↑ Bamberger, Walter (2010). "Interpersonal Trust – Attempt of a Definition". Scientific report, Technische Universität München. Retrieved 2011-08-16.
- ↑ Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., and Fehr, E. (2005) Oxytocin increases trust in humans" Nature 435, 2005, 673-676.
- ↑ Hardin, R. (eds.) (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation.
- ↑ Dennett, D.C. (1989) The Intentional Stance. Bradford Books.
- ↑ Shneiderman, B. (2000) Designing trust into online experiences. Communications of the ACM Volume 43, Number 12, Pages 57-59
- ↑ Luhmann, N. (2005) Risk: a sociological theory. AldineTransaction.
- http://www.economist.com/news/books-and-arts/21692840-why-people-are-so-easily-had-fool-me-once
- QUOTE: Humans are a trusting sort. This is largely a good thing, as progress requires co-operation, and co-operation demands trust. Countries with higher levels of trust grow faster and have more stable public institutions. Trusting citizens are healthier, happier and more likely to start their own businesses. People can be bad at spotting deception because, ultimately, very few are downright deceptive. This is great news for humanity. It is also a boon for crooks.
2014
- (Wikipedia, Simple, 2014) ⇒ http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_emotions#Robert_Plutchik.27s_theory Retrieved:2014-1-12.
- Robert Plutchik's theory of emotion says that the basic eight emotions are:
- Trust → a positive emotion; admiration is stronger; acceptance is weaker
- Robert Plutchik's theory of emotion says that the basic eight emotions are: