Arms Race: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "** ..." to "** …") |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
An [[Arms Race]] is a [[technological | An [[Arms Race]] is a [[technological competition]] that can be used to create [[military superiority system]]s (that support [[national security task]]s). | ||
* <B>AKA:</B> [[Military Competition]], [[Strategic Competition]], [[Weapons Race]]. | |||
* <B>Context:</B> | * <B>Context:</B> | ||
** It can | ** It can typically accelerate [[weapons development]] through [[competitive pressure]]s and [[security concern]]s. | ||
** | ** It can typically increase [[military spending]] through [[defense budget expansion]] and [[research allocation]]s. | ||
* <B> | ** It can typically advance [[military technology]] through [[innovation incentive]]s and [[development deadline]]s. | ||
** [[Naval Arms Race ( | ** It can typically reshape [[strategic balance]] through [[capability gap]]s and [[force projection ability]]. | ||
** [[Nuclear Arms Race (1945- | ** It can typically influence [[national priority]] through [[resource reallocation]] and [[industrial mobilization]]. | ||
** [[ | ** ... | ||
** | ** It can often strain [[international relation]]s through [[security dilemma]]s and [[threat perception]]s. | ||
** | ** It can often drive [[technological spillover]]s into [[civilian sector]]s and [[commercial application]]s. | ||
** | ** It can often create [[economic burden]]s through [[opportunity cost]]s and [[fiscal constraint]]s. | ||
* <B>Counter- | ** It can often intensify [[geopolitical tension]]s through [[alliance formation]] and [[regional instability]]. | ||
** [[Arms Control]], | ** It can often generate [[political pressure]]s through [[public fear]] and [[nationalist sentiment]]. | ||
** [[ | ** ... | ||
** [[ | ** It can range from being a [[Regional Arms Race]] to being a [[Global Arms Race]], depending on its [[geographical scope]]. | ||
* <B>See:</B> [[Military Technology]], [[Offensive Weapon]], [[Defensive Weapon]]. | ** It can range from being a [[Conventional Arms Race]] to being a [[Weapons of Mass Destruction Arms Race]], depending on its [[weapon type]]. | ||
** It can range from being a [[Limited Arms Race]] to being an [[Unrestricted Arms Race]], depending on its [[resource commitment]]. | |||
** It can range from being a [[Bilateral Arms Race]] to being a [[Multilateral Arms Race]], depending on its [[participant count]]. | |||
** It can range from being a [[Short-Term Arms Race]] to being a [[Long-Term Arms Race]], depending on its [[duration]]. | |||
** ... | |||
** It can establish [[military doctrine]]s through [[capability requirement]]s and [[strategic necessity]]. | |||
** It can drive [[scientific research]] through [[applied problem solving]] and [[technical challenge]]s. | |||
** It can shape [[diplomatic engagement]] through [[arms control negotiation]]s and [[treaty formation]]. | |||
** It can affect [[domestic politics]] through [[electoral priority]]s and [[budget debate]]s. | |||
** It can influence [[international system structure]] through [[power distribution]] and [[alliance pattern]]s. | |||
** ... | |||
* <B>Examples:</B> | |||
** [[Historical Arms Race Categori]]es, such as: | |||
*** [[Naval Arms Race]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Anglo-German Naval Arms Race (1898-1914)]] for [[sea power dominance]]. | |||
**** [[Washington Naval Arms Race (1921-1922)]] for [[treaty limitation]]. | |||
**** [[Cold War Naval Arms Race (1950-1990)]] for [[submarine supremacy]]. | |||
*** [[Nuclear Arms Race]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Early Nuclear Arms Race (1945-1960)]] for [[atomic weapon acquisition]]. | |||
**** [[Thermonuclear Arms Race (1952-1970)]] for [[hydrogen bomb capability]]. | |||
**** [[ICBM Arms Race (1957-1980)]] for [[missile delivery system]]. | |||
*** [[Aerospace Arms Race]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Space Race (1957-1969)]] for [[orbital capability demonstration]]. | |||
**** [[Strategic Bomber Race (1946-1960)]] for [[nuclear delivery platform]]. | |||
**** [[Air Defense System Race (1950-1980)]] for [[anti-aircraft capability]]. | |||
** [[Contemporary Arms Race Categori]]es, such as: | |||
*** [[Digital Arms Race]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Cyber Arms Race (2000-Present)]] for [[digital attack capability]]. | |||
**** [[Electronic Warfare Race (1990-Present)]] for [[signal disruption ability]]. | |||
**** [[Information Warfare Competition (2010-Present)]] for [[narrative control capability]]. | |||
*** [[Advanced Weapons Race]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Hypersonic Weapon Race (2010-Present)]] for [[missile defense evasion]]. | |||
**** [[Directed Energy Weapon Competition (2000-Present)]] for [[non-kinetic attack capability]]. | |||
**** [[Autonomous System Arms Race (2015-Present)]] for [[unmanned warfare ability]]. | |||
*** [[Intelligence Arms Race]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Satellite Surveillance Race (1960-Present)]] for [[global observation capability]]. | |||
**** [[AI Battlefield Analysis Competition (2020-Present)]] for [[combat information advantage]]. | |||
**** [[Quantum Computing Race (2015-Present)]] for [[encryption breaking capability]]. | |||
** [[Emerging Arms Race Categori]]es, such as: | |||
*** [[AI-Powered Arms Race]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[AI Weaponry Race (2020-Present)]] for [[intelligent targeting system]]. | |||
**** [[AI Strategic Planning Competition (2025-Present)]] for [[automated scenario analysis]]. | |||
**** [[AI Swarm Combat Race (2025-Present)]] for [[coordinated attack pattern]]. | |||
*** [[Biotechnology Arms Race]]s, such as: | |||
**** [[Biological Enhancement Race (2020-Present)]] for [[super-soldier development]]. | |||
**** [[Biological Defense Competition (2020-Present)]] for [[pathogen protection capability]]. | |||
**** [[Synthetic Biology Race (2025-Present)]] for [[engineered capability]]. | |||
** ... | |||
* <B>Counter-Examples:</B> | |||
** [[Arms Control Regime]], which establishes [[weapon limitation]]s rather than [[capability escalation]]. | |||
** [[Military Cooperation]], which promotes [[shared capability development]] instead of [[competitive advantage]]. | |||
** [[Peace Movement]], which advocates for [[conflict resolution]] over [[military preparation]]. | |||
** [[Disarmament Initiative]], which reduces [[weapon stockpile]]s rather than expanding them. | |||
** [[Technology Sharing Agreement]], which enables [[cooperative development]] instead of [[secretive advancement]]. | |||
* <B>See:</B> [[Military Technology]], [[Offensive Weapon]], [[Defensive Weapon]], [[Military-Industrial Complex]], [[Security Dilemma]], [[Deterrence Theory]], [[Strategic Stability]], [[Escalation Ladder]], [[Military Doctrine]]. | |||
---- | ---- | ||
Line 32: | Line 87: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
[[Category:Concept]] | [[Category:Concept]] | ||
[[Category:Military Strategy]] | |||
[[Category:International Relations]] | |||
[[Category:Security Studies]] | |||
[[Category:Strategic Competition]] | |||
[[Category:Quality Silver]] |
Latest revision as of 06:00, 8 March 2025
An Arms Race is a technological competition that can be used to create military superiority systems (that support national security tasks).
- AKA: Military Competition, Strategic Competition, Weapons Race.
- Context:
- It can typically accelerate weapons development through competitive pressures and security concerns.
- It can typically increase military spending through defense budget expansion and research allocations.
- It can typically advance military technology through innovation incentives and development deadlines.
- It can typically reshape strategic balance through capability gaps and force projection ability.
- It can typically influence national priority through resource reallocation and industrial mobilization.
- ...
- It can often strain international relations through security dilemmas and threat perceptions.
- It can often drive technological spillovers into civilian sectors and commercial applications.
- It can often create economic burdens through opportunity costs and fiscal constraints.
- It can often intensify geopolitical tensions through alliance formation and regional instability.
- It can often generate political pressures through public fear and nationalist sentiment.
- ...
- It can range from being a Regional Arms Race to being a Global Arms Race, depending on its geographical scope.
- It can range from being a Conventional Arms Race to being a Weapons of Mass Destruction Arms Race, depending on its weapon type.
- It can range from being a Limited Arms Race to being an Unrestricted Arms Race, depending on its resource commitment.
- It can range from being a Bilateral Arms Race to being a Multilateral Arms Race, depending on its participant count.
- It can range from being a Short-Term Arms Race to being a Long-Term Arms Race, depending on its duration.
- ...
- It can establish military doctrines through capability requirements and strategic necessity.
- It can drive scientific research through applied problem solving and technical challenges.
- It can shape diplomatic engagement through arms control negotiations and treaty formation.
- It can affect domestic politics through electoral prioritys and budget debates.
- It can influence international system structure through power distribution and alliance patterns.
- ...
- Examples:
- Historical Arms Race Categories, such as:
- Naval Arms Races, such as:
- Nuclear Arms Races, such as:
- Aerospace Arms Races, such as:
- Contemporary Arms Race Categories, such as:
- Digital Arms Races, such as:
- Advanced Weapons Races, such as:
- Intelligence Arms Races, such as:
- Emerging Arms Race Categories, such as:
- AI-Powered Arms Races, such as:
- Biotechnology Arms Races, such as:
- ...
- Historical Arms Race Categories, such as:
- Counter-Examples:
- Arms Control Regime, which establishes weapon limitations rather than capability escalation.
- Military Cooperation, which promotes shared capability development instead of competitive advantage.
- Peace Movement, which advocates for conflict resolution over military preparation.
- Disarmament Initiative, which reduces weapon stockpiles rather than expanding them.
- Technology Sharing Agreement, which enables cooperative development instead of secretive advancement.
- See: Military Technology, Offensive Weapon, Defensive Weapon, Military-Industrial Complex, Security Dilemma, Deterrence Theory, Strategic Stability, Escalation Ladder, Military Doctrine.
References
- https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2023/oct/26/new-global-arms-race-west-military-spending-conflict
- NOTES:
- In 2022, global military spending increased 3.7% to a new high of $2.24 trillion. Europe saw its steepest increase in over 30 years.
- The US frames China as a "threat" mainly as a reaction to China freeing itself from US economic dominion.
- Ukraine is seen not as an effort to restore law, but as part of a West vs Russia power struggle.
- NOTES:
2023
- (Wikipedia, 2023) ⇒ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arms_race Retrieved:2023-9-5.
- An arms race occurs when two or more groups compete in military superiority. It consists of a competition between two or more states to have superior armed forces, concerning production of weapons, the growth of a military, and the aim of superior military technology. Unlike a sporting race, which constitutes a specific event with winning interpretable as the outcome of a singular project, arms races constitute spiralling systems of on-going and potentially open-ended behavior. [1]
The existing scholarly literature is divided as to whether arms races correlate with war.[2] International-relations scholars explain arms races in terms of the security dilemma, engineering spiral models, states with revisionist aims, and deterrence models.[2]
- An arms race occurs when two or more groups compete in military superiority. It consists of a competition between two or more states to have superior armed forces, concerning production of weapons, the growth of a military, and the aim of superior military technology. Unlike a sporting race, which constitutes a specific event with winning interpretable as the outcome of a singular project, arms races constitute spiralling systems of on-going and potentially open-ended behavior. [1]
- ↑ Documents on Disarmament. Volume 126 of Publication (United States. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency), 1983, page 312 - "[...] the goal of across-the-board supremacy [...] would mean an uncontrolled, open-ended, and very expensive arms race."
- ↑ Jump up to: 2.0 2.1 Glaser, Charles L. (2010). Rational Theory of International Politics. Princeton University Press. pp. 228–232. ISBN 9780691143729.