Conditional Random Fields Training System: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Redirected page to CRF Training System) |
m (Text replacement - " Lei Li" to " Lei Li") |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
# | A [[Conditional Random Fields Training System]] is a [[model-based learning system]] that can solve a [[CRF training task]] (by applying a [[CRF algorithm]]s). | ||
* <B>Context:</B> | |||
** It can range from being a [[Conditional Random Fields Training System|CRF Library]] to being a [[Conditional Random Fields Training System|CRF Toolkit]] to being a [[Conditional Random Fields Training System|CRF Package]]. | |||
** … | |||
* <B>Example(s):</B> | |||
** [[MALLET Toolkit]]. | |||
** [[iitb.CRF Package]]. | |||
** [[CRFpp Package]]. | |||
** [[Kevin Murphy CRF Toolbox]]. | |||
** [[PyStruct]][http://pystruct.github.io/user_guide.html#chaincrf] “<i>[[PyStruct]] actually implements [[perceptron]] and [[max-margin learning]], not [[maximum likelihood learning]]. So these models might better be called [[Maximum Margin Random Fields]]. However, in the computer vision community, it seems most pairwise models are called CRFs, independent of the method of training.</i>” | |||
* <B>Counter-Example(s):</B> | |||
** a [[Factor Graph Toolkit]], like [[FACTORIE]]. | |||
** an [[HMM Toolkit]], like ... | |||
** an [[SVM Toolkit]], like [[SVMlight]]. | |||
** a [[Decision Tree Toolkit]], like [[C4.5]]. | |||
** a [[Logistic Regression Toolkit]], like [[LIBLINEAR]]. | |||
* <B>See:</B> [[Data Mining Package]]. | |||
---- | |||
---- | |||
== References == | |||
=== 2010 === | |||
* (Cheng, Sun, et al., 2010) ⇒ Yong Cheng, [[Chengjie Sun]], [[Lei Li]]n, Yuanchao Liu. ([[2010]]). “[http://books.google.com/books?id=KBOIX8TnWgoC&pg=PA192 A Comparison Study of Conditional Random Fields Toolkits].” In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computing, (ICIC 2010). [http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14831-6_26 doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14831-6_26] | |||
** ABSTRACT: [[Conditional random fields (CRF) model]] is an important and widely used [[sequence labeling model]]. [[In this paper, we]] introduce several commonly used [[Conditional Random Fields Training System|CRF toolkits]]. Through the analysis and comparison of the [[Conditional Random Fields Training System|toolkits]], we give each one’s advantages and disadvantages. [[We]] also count the popularity and applicable fields of them. At last, we give our comments for each toolkit. | |||
---- | |||
__NOTOC__ | |||
[[Category:Concept]] |
Latest revision as of 06:36, 8 March 2024
A Conditional Random Fields Training System is a model-based learning system that can solve a CRF training task (by applying a CRF algorithms).
- Context:
- It can range from being a CRF Library to being a CRF Toolkit to being a CRF Package.
- …
- Example(s):
- MALLET Toolkit.
- iitb.CRF Package.
- CRFpp Package.
- Kevin Murphy CRF Toolbox.
- PyStruct[1] “PyStruct actually implements perceptron and max-margin learning, not maximum likelihood learning. So these models might better be called Maximum Margin Random Fields. However, in the computer vision community, it seems most pairwise models are called CRFs, independent of the method of training.”
- Counter-Example(s):
- a Factor Graph Toolkit, like FACTORIE.
- an HMM Toolkit, like ...
- an SVM Toolkit, like SVMlight.
- a Decision Tree Toolkit, like C4.5.
- a Logistic Regression Toolkit, like LIBLINEAR.
- See: Data Mining Package.
References
2010
- (Cheng, Sun, et al., 2010) ⇒ Yong Cheng, Chengjie Sun, Lei Lin, Yuanchao Liu. (2010). “A Comparison Study of Conditional Random Fields Toolkits.” In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computing, (ICIC 2010). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14831-6_26
- ABSTRACT: Conditional random fields (CRF) model is an important and widely used sequence labeling model. In this paper, we introduce several commonly used CRF toolkits. Through the analysis and comparison of the toolkits, we give each one’s advantages and disadvantages. We also count the popularity and applicable fields of them. At last, we give our comments for each toolkit.