U.S. War on Drugs (1971-)
(Redirected from War on Drugs)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
A U.S. War on Drugs (1971-) is a policy era in which U.S. policy towards most recreational drugs (excluding recreational alcohol and recreational nicotine) was a prohibition policy.
- …
- Counter-Example(s):
- See: Medical Problem, UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, Prohibition (Drugs), Military Intervention, Illegal Drug Trade.
References
2016
- (Wikipedia, 2016) ⇒ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_on_Drugs Retrieved:2016-1-19.
- The War on Drugs is an American term commonly applied to a campaign of prohibition of drugs, military aid, and military intervention, with the stated aim being to reduce the illegal drug trade.[1] [2] This initiative includes a set of drug policies that are intended to discourage the production, distribution, and consumption of psychoactive drugs that the participating governments and the UN have made illegal. The term was popularized by the media shortly after a press conference given on 18 June 1971, by United States President Richard Nixon — the day after publication of a special message from President Nixon to the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control—during which he declared drug abuse "public enemy number one". That message to the Congress included text about devoting more federal resources to the "prevention of new addicts, and the rehabilitation of those who are addicted", but that part did not receive the same public attention as the term "war on drugs". [3] However, two years even prior to this, Nixon had formally declared a "war on drugs" that would be directed toward eradication, interdiction, and incarceration. [4] Today, the Drug Policy Alliance, which advocates for an end to the War on Drugs, estimates that the United States spends $51 billion annually on these initiatives. On 13 May 2009, Gil Kerlikowske — the Director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP)— signaled that the Obama administration did not plan to significantly alter drug enforcement policy, but also that the administration would not use the term "War on Drugs", because Kerlikowske considers the term to be "counter-productive". ONDCP's view is that "drug addiction is a disease that can be successfully prevented and treated... making drugs more available will make it harder to keep our communities healthy and safe". One of the alternatives that Kerlikowske has showcased is the drug policy of Sweden, which seeks to balance public health concerns with opposition to drug legalization. The prevalence rates for cocaine use in Sweden are barely one-fifth of those in Spain, the biggest consumer of the drug. In June 2011, a self-appointed Global Commission on Drug Policy released a critical report on the War on Drugs, declaring: "The global war on drugs has failed, with devastating consequences for individuals and societies around the world. Fifty years after the initiation of the UN Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, and years after President Nixon launched the US government's war on drugs, fundamental reforms in national and global drug control policies are urgently needed." The report was criticized by organizations that oppose a general legalization of drugs.[5]
- ↑ Cockburn and St. Clair, 1998: Chapter 14
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedBullington 1990 39–55
- ↑ Richard Nixoan:203 - Special Message to the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control, June 17, 1971
- ↑ Payan, Tony (2013). A War that Can’t Be Won. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
- ↑ Global Commission on Drug Policy Offers Reckless, Vague Drug Legalization Proposal, Institute for Behavior and Health, Inc, July 12, 2011. (PDF).
- http://www.salon.com/2016/01/19/the_only_way_to_stop_the_next_el_chapo_why_america_needs_to_legalize_all_its_drugs/
- QUOTE: The cartels don’t so much profit from shipping drugs to the United States as from controlling or taxing a flow of drugs that would exist no matter who is in charge of it. Since drugs are illegal, a market that the government could otherwise control and oversee is instead rendered an underground economy run on the streets by people who enforce contracts and win market share by perpetrating violence and corrupting public officials. ..
... its pretty clear that the prohibitionist system creates the fantastic profits that make the illegal drug trafficking organizations a going venture. So if there’s some form of effective legalization that provides lawful access, and is carried out in a way that can minimize the public health risks, you can imagine that the revenues flowing to criminal groups would evaporate over time.”
- QUOTE: The cartels don’t so much profit from shipping drugs to the United States as from controlling or taxing a flow of drugs that would exist no matter who is in charge of it. Since drugs are illegal, a market that the government could otherwise control and oversee is instead rendered an underground economy run on the streets by people who enforce contracts and win market share by perpetrating violence and corrupting public officials. ..
2014
- (Wikipedia, 2014) ⇒ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_Ginsberg Retrieved:2014-11-28.
- … Ginsberg took part in decades of non-violent political protest against everything from the Vietnam War to the War on Drugs. ...