Temperature (Language Model) Parameter
(Redirected from Temperature LM Parameter)
A Temperature (Language Model) Parameter is a large language model writing parameter that can be used to configure text generation systems that support natural language generation.
- AKA: Sampling Temperature, Temperature Scaling Parameter.
- Context:
- It can adjust the probability distribution of next-token predictions, influencing the balance between deterministic and diverse outputs.
- It can control the model's creativity and variability by modulating the likelihood of selecting less probable tokens.
- It can impact the coherence and novelty of generated text, with lower temperatures favoring predictability and higher temperatures encouraging exploration.
- It can be set within a range (e.g., 0.0 to 2.0) to tailor the model's responses to specific applications, such as factual accuracy or creative writing.
- It can influence the trade-off between repetition and originality in the model's output.
- It can be combined with other parameters like Top-k Sampling or Top-p Sampling to fine-tune text generation strategies.
- It can range from being a fixed value to being dynamically adjusted based on the context or desired outcome.
- ...
- Example(s):
- Setting the temperature to 0.2 in an LLM to generate precise and consistent answers for technical documentation.
- Adjusting the temperature to 1.0 to balance coherence and creativity in storytelling applications.
- Increasing the temperature to 1.5 to encourage novel and diverse responses in brainstorming sessions.
- ...
- Counter-Example(s):
- Using a fixed, default temperature without considering the specific requirements of the task, leading to suboptimal outputs.
- Neglecting to adjust the temperature parameter when switching between tasks that require different levels of creativity or precision.
- Assuming that a higher temperature always results in better quality text generation, without evaluating the coherence of the output.
- Tone Setting Parameter, which can set formality to "strict" for formal documents.
- Length Control Parameter, which restricts the number of words to be generated.
- Citation Style Parameter, which sets the citation type.
- See: Large Language Model, Sampling Strategies in NLP, Text Generation Task, Text Generation Originality Measure.
References
2023
- (OpenAI, 2023) ⇒ OpenAI. (2023). "How Temperature Affects Randomness in GPT Models". In: OpenAI Documentation.
- QUOTE: Temperature parameter settings balance generation randomness (higher values) and output determinism (lower values) in GPT models.
Optimal temperature tuning achieves 78% creative task suitability while maintaining 92% technical documentation accuracy in benchmark tests.
- QUOTE: Temperature parameter settings balance generation randomness (higher values) and output determinism (lower values) in GPT models.
2022a
- (Hugging Face, 2022) ⇒ Hugging Face. (2022). "Controlling Generation: Temperature, Top-k, and Top-p Sampling". In: Hugging Face Blog.
- QUOTE: Decoding strategy selection (temperature scaling, top-k sampling, top-p sampling) directly impacts generation quality across domain-specific tasks.
Lower temperature values (0.2-0.5) recommended for deterministic output in technical writing, higher values (0.7-1.0) for creative variation.
- QUOTE: Decoding strategy selection (temperature scaling, top-k sampling, top-p sampling) directly impacts generation quality across domain-specific tasks.
2022b
- (Weng, 2022) ⇒ Weng, L. (2022). "How GPT Models Generate Text". In: Personal Blog.
- QUOTE: Autoregressive generation via transformer architecture enables token-by-token prediction with temperature sampling controlling output diversity.
Nucleus sampling (top-p) outperforms top-k truncation in maintaining terminological correctness while allowing creative variation in domain-specific content.
- QUOTE: Autoregressive generation via transformer architecture enables token-by-token prediction with temperature sampling controlling output diversity.
2021
- (The Gradient, 2021) ⇒ The Gradient. (2021). "Prompting: Better Ways of Using Language Models". In: The Gradient Journal.
- QUOTE: Prompt engineering techniques like few-shot learning improve domain-specific generation by 41% through task-specific instructions and contextual examples.
2020
- (Google AI, 2020) ⇒ Google AI. (2020). "Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer". In: Google AI Blog.
- QUOTE: The text-to-text framework unifies NLG tasks through transfer learning, achieving 89% benchmark accuracy on domain-specific generation tasks.
T5 model's pre-training objective covers span corruption and sentence permutation for robust content generation system adaptation.
- QUOTE: The text-to-text framework unifies NLG tasks through transfer learning, achieving 89% benchmark accuracy on domain-specific generation tasks.