2009 StrategicReadingOntsAndTheFutOfSciPub

(Renear & Palmer, 2009) ⇒ Allen H. Renear, and Carole L. Palmer. (2009). “Strategic Reading, Ontologies, and the Future of Scientific Publishing.” In: Science, 325(5942). doi:10.1126/science.1157784.

Subject Headings: Research Paper, Ontology.

Notes

Cited By

~45 http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=%22Strategic+Reading%2C+Ontologies%2C+and+the+Future+of+Scientific+Publishing%22+2009

2009

(Attwood et al., 2009) ⇒ Teresa K. Attwood, Douglas B. Kell, Philip McDermott, James Marsh, Steve R. Pettifer, and David Thorne. (2009). “Calling International Rescue: knowledge lost in literature and data landslide!.” In: Biochemical Journal, 424. doi:10.1042/BJ20091474

Quotes

Abstract

The revolution in scientific publishing that has been promised since the 1980s is about to take place. Scientists have always read strategically, working with many articles simultaneously to search, filter, scan, link, annotate, and analyze fragments of content. An observed recent increase in strategic reading in the online environment will soon be further intensified by two current trends: (i) the widespread use of digital indexing, retrieval, and navigation resources and (ii) the emergence within many scientific disciplines of interoperable ontologies. Accelerated and enhanced by reading tools that take advantage of ontologies, reading practices will become even more rapid and indirect, transforming the ways in which scientists engage the literature and shaping the evolution of scientific publishing.

References

1. (Spasic et al., 2005) ⇒ Irena Spasic, Sophia Ananiadou, John McNaught, and Anand Kumar. (2005). “Text Mining and Ontologies in Biomedicine: Making sense of raw text.” In: Briefings in Bioinformatics, 6(3). doi:10.1093/bib/6.3.239
2. D. R. Swanson, N. R. Smalheiser, Artif. Intell. 91, 183 (1997).
3. National Library of Medicine, http://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/.
4. B. Mons, BMC Bioinform. 6, 142 (2005).
5. L. J. Jensen, J. Saric, P. Bork, Nat. Rev. Genet. 7, 119 (2006).
6. P. Bourne, PLoS Comput. Biol. 1, e34 (2005).
7. P. Murray-Rust, H. S. Rzepa, J. Digit. Inform. 5, issue 1 (2004).
8. David Nicholas, Paul Huntington, P. Williams, T. Dobrowolski, J. Doc. 60, 24 (2004).
9. (Nicholas et al., 2007) ⇒ David Nicholas, Paul Huntington, Hamid R. Jamali, and Tom Dobrowolski. (2007). “Characterising and Evaluating Information Seeking behaviour in a digital Environment: spotlight on the ‘bouncer’”, Information Processing and Management, 43(4), 1085-1102. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.08.007.
10. (Tenopir & King, 2008) ⇒ Carol Tenopir, and Donald W. King. (2008). “Do E-Journals Narrow or Broaden Science? Some Additional Evidence from Studies of Reading Patterns.” IN: D-Lib, November/December
11. B. Schatz et al., Computer 32, 51 (1999).
12. A. P. Bishop, Inf. Process. Manage. 35, 255 (1999).
13. C. L. Palmer, Work at the Boundaries of Science: Information and the Interdisciplinary Research Process (Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2001).
14. Carole L. Palmer, Melissa H. Cragin, and Timothy P. Hogan. (2007). “Weak information work in scientific discovery " In: Information Processing & Management, 43(3). doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.06.003
15. O. Bodenreider, R. Stevens, Brief. Bioinform. 7, 256 (2006).
16. L. Strömbäck, D. Hall, P. Lambrix, Proteomics 7, 857 (2007).
17. M. Ashburner et al., Nat. Genet. 25, 25 (2000).
18. B. Smith et al., Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1251 (2007).
19. Gene Ontology, www.geneontology.org/.
20. The examples are from “An Introduction to the Gene Ontology” www.geneontology.org/GO.doc.shtml.
21. World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/XML/.
22. James H. Coombs, A. H. Renear, S. J. DeRose, Communications of the ACM 30, 933 (1987).
23. A. Renear, D. Dubin, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, C. Huitfeldt, in: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, R. Furuta, J. I. Maletic, E. Muson, Eds. (Association for Computing Machinery Press, New York, 2002), pp. 119–126.
24. World Wide Web Consortium, www.w3.org/2001/sw/.
25. J. A. Blake, C. J. Bult, J. Biomed. Inform. 39, 314 (2006).
26. J. Blake, Nat. Biotechnol. 22, 773 (2004).
27. M. R. Seringhaus, M. B. Gerstein, BMC Bioinform. 8, 17 (2007).
28. D. Sholton, Learn. Publ. 22, 85 (2009).
29. M. Krallinger, A. Valencia, Genome Biol. 6, 224 (2005).
30. J.-j. Kim, D. Rebholz-Schuhmann, Brief. Bioinform. 9, 452 (2008).
31. H. M. Müller, E. E. Kenny, P. W. Sternberg, PLoS Biol. 2, e309 (2004).
32. R. Hoffmann, A. Valencia, Nat. Genet. 36, 664 (2004).
33. I. Foster, Science 308, 814 (2005).
34. P. Boyce, D. W. King, C. Montgomery, C. Tenopir, Ser. Libr. 46, 121 (2004).
35. D. W. King, C. Tenopir, C. Montgomery, S. E. Aerni, D-Lib Mag. 9, issue 10 (2003).

,

	Author	volume	Date Value	title	type	journal	titleUrl	doi	note	year
2009 StrategicReadingOntsAndTheFutOfSciPub	Allen H. Renear Carole L. Palmer			Strategic Reading, Ontologies, and the Future of Scientific Publishing		Scientific Discipline	http://people.lis.illinois.edu/~renear/norobots/StrategicReadingSCI09.pdf	10.1126/science.1157784		2009